Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Ideology and Values in Turkey's Foreign Policy

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-113-129

Abstract

The article considers the role of ideology and values in the formation and implementation of the current foreign policy of the Republic of Turkey. Taking into account the increasing role of regional actors such as Turkey in international politics, studying their tactics and mechanisms of influence on the global political environment is necessary to explain the further transformation of the international system.

The study reveals the strengthening role of the ideology and values in world politics in general and in individual states, such as Turkey, in particular. Under the rule of the Justice and Development Party headed by the current President R.T. Erdogan the country began a gradual transition from «Kemalism», which includes the preservation of secularism, ProWestern democratic values and a gradual departure from the Ottoman heritage, to a more conservative domestic and foreign policy, characterized by the strengthening of Islamist and nationalist sentiments, as well as the transition to the policy of «neo-Ottomanism», «neo-pan-Turkism». The return of the idea of «aggrandizement» of the country to the official political discourse has affected the conduct of Turkey's foreign policy towards both the regional states and the world arena as a whole.

The Republic not only began self-restoration as an autonomous actor of international relations in the eyes of the key world powers, but also started to spread its own values and ideas among the population of both the Middle East and among the states which constitute a national interest for Turkey (Russia, the post-Soviet space, etc.), thus influencing them at various levels and involving them in its orbit of influence – both politically, economically and from a humanitarian point of view.

Using «hard power» abroad no longer meets the current Turkey’s policy. Instead it relies on forging humanitarian ties, combining initiatives in the cultural, educational and scientific fields to achieve a long-term influence. The Republic of Turkey is trying to spread the following values among the world community:

«Justice». International relations must be just and fair. For Turkey it means conformity with its national interests.

«Religious fatalism». Government actions both at home and abroad are legitimized through references to religion and fate.

«Democratic values». The Republic of Turkey considers itself the most democratic state in the world and contrasts itself with “Western democracies”, which, according to the Turkish leadership, are spreading hegemony rather than democracy.

«State-centrism» and collectivism. The interests of the state, society, and especially the Muslim Ummah, are placed above the values of the individual.

«Traditional values». Given the Islamization and conservatism of Turkish society as a whole, traditional values also begin to play a major role in the general political discourse of the state.

«Culture». Turkey also makes adjustments to the concept of «culture» in very inclusive terms, presenting its culture as a «melting pot» that can turn anything into Turkish.

«Respect». In the eastern tradition, it is customary to show respect to elders, as well as neighbors and guests. Turkey uses a demonstration of respect in foreign policy instrumentally and pragmatically. An example of this is the address of the President of Turkey in relation to the leaders of other states: Nursultan Nazarbayev – «aksakal» of the Turkic world, Vladimir Putin is a «dear friend».

About the Author

V. A. Avatkov
Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences; Diplomatic Academy of MFA
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Avatkov – Candidate of Political Science, Senior Researcher at IMEMO RAS; Associate Professor at Diplomatic Academy of MFA.

Profsoyuznaya St. 23, Moscow, 117997.



References

1. National and State Identity in Turkey: The Transformation of the Republic’s Status in the International System. 2015. Toni Alaranta. Rowman and Littlefield.

2. Ouzlu T. 2007. Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 61(1). P. 81-97

3. Saraçoğlu C., Demirkol Ö. 2015. Nationalism and Foreign Policy Discourse in Turkey Under the AKP Rule: Geography, History and National Identity, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 42(3). Pp. 301-319.

4. Aktual'nye problemy mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenii i vneshnei politiki v XXI veke: Monografia. 2017. [Actual Problems of International Relations and Foreign Policy in XXI Century: Monograph]. Ed. by T.V. Kashirina and V.A. Avatkov. Moscow: Dashkov i K°. (In Russian)

5. Avatkov V.A. 2017. Krizis turetskoi identichnosti [Crisis of Turkish Identity]. Politika i Obshchestvo. No. 4. P. 96-103. (In Russian) DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.4.19718

6. Avatkov V.A. 2018. Tyurkskii mir i tyurkskie organizatsii [Turkic World and Turkic Organizations]. Mirovaia politika. No. 2. P. 11-25. (In Russian) DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.2.26047

7. Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Hrustalev M.A. 2002. Ocherki teorii i metodologii politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenii [Essays on the Theory and Methodology of Political Analysis of International Relations]. Moscow: NOFMO. (In Russian)

8. Cibenko V.V. 2016. Obyknovennyj neoosmanizm: Osmanskie ochagi i yanychary dvorca [Ordinary Neo-Ottomanism: The Ottoman Hearths and Janissaries of the Palace]. In Arabskie marshruty v aziatskom kontekste [Arab Routes in the Asian Context]. SPb. P. 394-404. (In Russian)

9. Druzhilovskii S.B., Avatkov V.A. 2013. Vneshnepoliticheskie ideologemy Turtsii (2002- 2012 gg.) [Ideologems of Turkey's Foreign Policy (2002-2012)]. Obozrevatel'. No. 6. P. 73-88. (In Russian)

10. Dynkin A.A. 2015. Krizis miroporiadka: poiski vyhoda [Crisis of the World Order: Search for a Way out]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia]. Vol. 196. P. 63-73. (In Russian)

11. Gromyko A.A. 2016. Postoianstvo i izmenchivost' v istorii mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenii [Constancy and Variability in the History of International Relations]. Sovremennaia Evropa, No. 1 (67). P. 5-8. (In Russian)

12. Inozemtsev V.L., Karaganov S. 2005. O mirovom poriadke XXI veka [On the World Order of the XXI Century]. ‒ Rossiia v global'noi politike [Russia in Global Politics]. 3(1). (In Russian)

13. Kamenskaia G.V., Solov'ev E.G., Smirnov A.N. 2015. Politicheskie ideologii v sovremennom mire: krizis ili ocherednoi etap evolyutsii? [Political Ideologies in the Modern World: Crisis or the Next Stage of Evolution?]. Vlast'. 23(12). P. 101-108. (In Russian)

14. Kosolapov N.A. 2006. Krizis ratsional'noi vsemirnosti [Crisis of Rational Worldliness] Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 4(10). P. 55-67(In Russian)

15. Nadein-Raevskij V.A. 2016. Idejnaya bor'ba i «Novaya Turciya» [Ideological Struggle and “New Turkey”]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 2. P. 22-31. (In Russian)

16. Voitolovskii F.G. 2007. Ideologicheskaia refleksiia mirovoi politiki [Ideological Reflection of World Politics]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 5(3). (In Russian)

17. Voitolovskii F.G. 2017. Opredelenie strategicheskih tselei – eto sfera ideologii… [Definition of Strategic Goals is a Sphere of Ideology...]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 15(1). (In Russian) DOI 10.17994/IT.2017.15.1.48.12


Review

For citations:


Avatkov V.A. Ideology and Values in Turkey's Foreign Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;12(4):113-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-113-129

Views: 3310


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)