One Belt One Road Project: Harmonization of Russia’s and China’s Long-tTrm Interests

The article aims at evaluating the One Belt One Road project implemented by China that will define long-term trajectories of the world trade and finance development as well as prospects of Russia’s participation in this project. It seems that the project under consideration is not a full alternative to the existing nowadays world system of railroad and sea shipping both from the viewpoint of the shipping cost and the scope of investment required. A possibility of full-scale refocusing of Russia’s transport systems (the Trans-Siberian Railway, the Northern Sea Route) on the One Belt One Road project is not currently obvious, thus, one cannot state with certainty Russia’s role in this project. Besides, implementing this project results in building in Eurasia a China-centric economy system that does not coincide with the structures built by Russia, i.e. the Eurasian Economic Union, the Customs Union and other ones. At the same time, the One Belt One Road project seems to have no alternatives. None of the other countries has proposed a project that can be compared with the One Belt One Road one in terms of being large-scale, having a global impact as well as long-term effects. It is believed, that after the implementation of the project is complete, the technological and social differences between Europe’s and China’s potentials, which were the reason for shipping goods from Southeast Asia to Europe over the past centuries, will be reduced to a significant extent. In terms of this the China-centric world will have to provide different noneconomic reasons for its existence, i.e. provide the world with new values and meanings of the postindustrial world. In this context Russia’s participating in the One Belt One Road project may appear to be necessary: Russia can act as a project’s security operator, a mediator between China and the countries who are participants of the Silk Road Economic Belt in cases where their interests collide. Russia can also generate values and meanings of economic processes. The safe transportation routes Russia has, i.e. the Trans-Siberian Railway, the Northern Sea Route as well as long-term friendly relations with the countries-participants of the Silk Road Economic Belt and Russia’s being experienced in harmonizing different interests can become the key aspects contributing to success of this project.

One Belt One Road, Trans-Siberian Railway, Northern Sea Route, world trade, Eurasian Economic Union, transport

1. Denisov I. Shelkovaya bezopasnost': novaya kitayskaya kontseptsiya razvitiya i pravila igry v Yevrazii [Silk Security: a New Chinese Concept of Development and the Rules of the Game in Eurasia]. Indeks bezopasnosti ‒ Security Index, 2015, no. 3 (114), vol. 21, pp. 51-60. (In Russian).

2. Druzhinin A.G., Dun YA. «Odin poyas ‒ odin put'»: vozmozhnosti dlya regionov zapadnogo porubezh'ya Rossii [“One Belt, One Road”: Opportunities for the Regions of the Western Frontier of Russia]. Baltiyskiy region, 2018, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 39-55. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-3 (In Russian).

3. Zhuravel' A.I. Sebestoimost' zheleznodorozhnykh perevozok [Cost of Rail Transportation]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo SGUPSa, 2000. 304 p. (In Russian).

4. Zbarashchenko V.S. Metalogisticheskaya intermodal'naya transportno-tekhnologicheskaya sistema Germaniya – Rossiya

5. – Tsentral'naya Aziya – Afganistan – Kitay [Methalogistic Intermodal Transport and Technological System Germany ‒ Russia ‒ Central Asia ‒ Afghanistan ‒ China]. Yevraziyskaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya, 2009, no. 1, pp. 68-75. (In Russian).

6. Izderzhki i sebestoimost' zheleznodorozhnykh perevozok [Costs of Rail Transportation] / ed. by N.G. Smekhova, Yu.N. Kozhevnikov. Moscow, FGBOU «Uchebno-metodicheskiy tsentr po obrazovaniyu na zheleznodorozhnom transporte», 2015. 472 p. (In Russian).

7. Larina O.N., Karatayeva K.E. Initsiativa «Odin poyas ‒ odin put'» ‒ novaya platforma dlya rasshireniya rossiysko-kitayskogo sotrudnichestva v transportnoy sfere [The Initiative “One Belt, One Road” ‒ a New Platform for Expanding Russian-Chinese Cooperation in the Transport Sector]. Problemy natsional'noy strategii, 2017, no. 6(45), pp. 11-48. (In Russian).

8. Lepa T.P. Retrospektiva i perspektiva razvitiya torgovo-tamozhennykh otnosheniy mezhdu Rossiyey i Kitayem [Retrospective and Development Prospects of Trade and Customs Relations between Russia and China]. Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2018, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 284-291. (In Russian).

9. Litvinov A.I. Politika sovremennykh «sholkovykh putey» [Politics of Modern “Silk Roads”]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta ‒ MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2016, no. 4 (49), pp. 176-180. (In Russian).

10. Luzyanin S.G. «Odin poyas, odin put'»: rossiyskaya proyektsiya i problemy sopryazheniya [“One Belt, One Road”: the Russian Projection and the Problems of Conjugation]. Kitay v mirovoy i regional'noy politike. Istoriya i sovremennost', 2017. (In Russian).

11. Mikheyev V., Lukonin S. Kitay posle Boao – 2015 [China aſter Boao ‒ 2015]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 8, pp. 61-70. (In Russian).

12. Mikheyev V.V., Lukonin S.A. Kitay: novyye trendy razvitiya na rubezhe 2015-2016 gg. [China: New Development Trends at the Turn of 2015-2016]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2016, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 24-34. (In Russian).

13. Novyy Shelkovyy put' i yego znacheniye dlya Rossii [New Silk Road and Its Significance for Russia]. Moscow, DeLi plyus, 2016. 234 p. (In Russian).

14. Podberyozkina O.A. Transportnyye koridory v rossiyskikh integratsionnykh proyektakh na primere EAES [Transport Corridors in Russian Integration Projects on the Example of the EAEU)]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta ‒ MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, no. 1 (40), pp. 57-65. (In Russian).

15. Portnyakov V.Ya. Vozvrashcheniye Kitaya: chto dal'she? [China's Return: What Next?]. Rossiya v global'noy politike ‒ Russia in Global Affairs, 2014, no. 3, pp. 34-43. (In Russian).

16. Ryshkov A.V. Zheleznodorozhnyye transportnyye koridory: sostoyaniye, problemy, napravleniya razvitiya [Railway Transport Corridors: State, Problems, Directions of Development]. Transgranichnyye transportnyye koridory «Vostok-Zapad»: vyzovy dlya natsional'noy bezopasnosti. Moscow, RISI, 2014. Pp. 22-23. (In Russian).

17. Sukhodolov Ya.A. Evolyutsiya i sovremennaya spetsifika rossiysko-kitayskoy torgovli [Evolution and Modern Specificity of the Russian-Chinese Trade]. Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2016, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 357-366. (In Russian).

18. Sukhodolov A.P. Kitayskaya Vostochnaya zheleznaya doroga: opyt Rossii i Kitaya po sovmestnoy realizatsii krupnomasshtabnykh proyektov [Chinese Eastern Railway: the Experience of Russia and China in the Joint Implementation of Large-scale Projects]. Izvestiya IGEA, 2014, no. 3 (95), pp. 72-77. (In Russian).

19. Sukhodolov A.P. Ideologicheskaya funktsiya sredstv massovoy informatsii v usloviyakh aktual'nykh informatsionnykh voyn [The Ideological Function of the Media in the Context of Current Information Wars]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, 2015, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 117-126. DOI: 10.17150/2308-6203.2015.4(2).117-126. (In Russian).

20. Khu An'gan, Ma Vey, Yan' Ilun. «Sychou chzhi lu tszintszi day»: chzhan'lyue neykhan', dinvey khe shisyan' lutszin [Silk Road Economic Belt: Strategy, Space and Ways of Realization]. Tsyuyyuy yuy chenshi tszintszi, 2014, no. 5, pp. 3-13. (In Chinese).

21. Tsvigun I.V., Balashova M.A., Sukhodolov Ya.A. Povysheniye natsional'noy konkurentosposobnosti Rossii v kontekste razvitiya torgovo-ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva s Kitayem [Enhancing Russia's National Competitiveness in the Context of Developing Trade and Economic Cooperation with China]. Baikal Research Journal, 2015, vol. 6, no. 5. (In Russian).

22. Chubarov I., Kalashnikov D. «Odin poyas – odin put'»: globalizatsiya po-kitayski [“One Belt, One Road”: Globalization by China]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 25-33. (In Russian).

23. Shalak A.V. Rossiya i Kitay: vozmozhnosti strategicheskogo sotrudnichestva cherez prizmu regional'nykh svyazey [Russia and China: Opportunities for Strategic Cooperation through the Prism of Regional Relations]. Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2017, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 292-297. (In Russian).

24. Vinokurov E., Tsukarev T. The Belt and Road Initiative and the Transit Countries: an Economic Assessment of Land Transport Corridors. Area Development and Policy, 2017, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93-113. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2017.1385406

25. Ferdinand P. Westward ho-the China Dream and ‘One Belt, One Road’: Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 2016, vol. 92, no. 4. p. 941. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12660

26. Li Yongquan. The Greater Eurasian Partnership and the Belt and Road Initiative: Can the Two Be Linked? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2018, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2018.07.004

27. Lu Na-Xi, Huang Meng-Fang, Lu Shan-Bing. How the Belt and Road Initiative Can Help Strengthen the Role of the SCO and Deepen China’s Cooperation with Russia and the Countries of Central Asia. India Quarterly, 2019, no. 1(75), pp. 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0974928418821484

28. Peyrouse S. The Evolution of Russia's Views on the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Policy, 2017, no. 24, pp. 96-102.

29. Svetlicinii A. China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union: «Integrating the Integrations». Public Administration Issues, 2018, special issue.

30. Yii K. Bee K. Cheam W., Chong Y., Lee C. Is Transportation Infrastructure Important to the One Belt One Road (OBOR) Initiative? Empirical Evidence from the Selected Asian Countries. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, no. 11. DOI: 10.3390/su10114131

31. Zeng J. Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of ‘One Belt One Road’ and ‘New Type of Great Power Relations.’ JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, 2017, vol. 55, no. 5. pp. 1162-1176. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12535