Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Targeted Sanctions: a Tool of Foreign Policy, Unfair Competition or Global Social Engineering?

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-3-66-17-41

Abstract

Through the recent decades, the use of asymmetric and hybrid measures in international relations has acquired a qualitatively new scale and system. Today such measures have turned into one of the leading forms of external pressure and subsequent coercion, often exceeding the effectiveness of such straightforward instruments as the threat of potential use of force and almost equal to real power actions. Arguably, among those asymmetric and hybrid measures, Western countries assign a key role to the pressure of international sanction upon competitor nations and uncooperative actors on the world arena. The article is devoted to a critical analysis of some common approaches to the study of the problems of «targeted» sanctions in the theory and practice of international relations and the use of sanctions as a means of achieving geostrategic objectives, including such ambitious ones as social constructivism and social engineering on national, regional and global scales. Particular attention is paid to the contribution of Thomas Biersteker to the development of the theory and of practical designs of «targeted sanctions» in international relations. The author disputes with him over some issues related to the effectiveness of targeted sanctions and the impact they produce upon various sectors of the targeted societies. Based on the author’s schematic matrix of sanctional influences upon national elites and possible limits of their responses, the article formulates the principles of segmentation of the national elites both for the purposes of identifying the layers most susceptible to sanctional pressure and singling out most effective and capable strata from the point of view of practical implementation of the indented outcomes of the undertaken pressure from the outside.

About the Author

L. L. Fituni
Institute of African studies; Peoples ' friendship University of Russia; ISAA MGU im. M. V. Lomonosov; St. Petersburg state University;
Russian Federation
Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr.Sc. (Economics), Professor; Deputy Director, Institute of African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor at PFUR, Moscow State University and StPetersburg State University


References

1. Abramova I.O., Fituni L.L. Potentsial afrikanskogo kontinenta v strategii razvitiya rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Potential of the African Continent in the Development Strategy of the Russian Economy]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 24-35. (In Russian).

2. Zhdanov Yu.N. Prinuditel'nye mery v mezhdunarodnom prave [Coercive Measures in International Law]. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, Moskva, 1999, p. 258. (In Russian).

3. Keshner M.V. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Economic Sanctions in Modern International Law] Moscow, Prospekt, 2015, 184 p. (In Russian).

4. Kryuchkova I.N. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii Soveta Bezopasnosti Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v mezhdunarodnom publichnom prave i mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Economic Sanctions of the United Nations Security Council in Public International Law and Private International Law]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2005. (In Russian).

5. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoi otvetstvennosti [Right of International Liability]. Moscow, Volters Kluver, 2004, 432 p. (In Russian).

6. Timofeev I., Makhmutov T. Politika sanktsii: tseli, strategii, instrumenty [Sanctions Policy: Goals, Strategies, Tools]. Khrestomatiya. RSMD. Moscow, 2018. (In Russian).

7. Fituni L.L., Abramova I.O. Politicheskoe manipulirovanie natsional'nymi elitami - sredstvo sokhraneniya sushchestvuyushchego miroporyadka [Political Manipulation of National Elites – a Means of Preserving the Existing World Order]. Uchenye zapiski Instituta Afriki RAN, 2018, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 11-17. (In Russian).

8. Abashidze A.Kh. The Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures on Human Rights, Development, Cooperation, International Relations. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 64-69. (In Russian).

9. Andreas P. Criminalizing Consequences of Sanctions: Embargo Busting and Its Legacy. International Studies Quarterly, 2005, no. 49, pp. 335-360.

10. Bapat N.A., Morgan T.C. Multilateral versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered: A Test Using New Data. International Studies Quarterly, no. 53 (2009), pp. 1075-1094.

11. Barber J. Economic Sanctions as a Policy Instrument. International Affairs, 1979, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 367-384.

12. Biersteker T.J. et al. UN targeted sanctions datasets (1991–2013). Journal of Peace Research, 2018, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 404-412.

13. Biersteker T.J., Eckert S.E., Tourinho M. (eds.). Targeted sanctions: The impacts and effectiveness of United Nations action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016, 442 p.

14. Biersteker Th. J., Sue E. Addressing Challenges to Targeted Sanctions: An Update to the ‘Watson Report’. Geneva, The Graduate Institute, 2009.

15. Biersteker Th., Weber C. (eds.). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996. 278. p.

16. Biersteker Th. J., Sue E. Strengthening Targeted Sanctions through Fair and Clear Procedures Report commissioned by the governments of Germany, Switzerland and Sweden. Providence, RI, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, 2006.

17. Bond I., Odendahl C., Rankin J. Frozen: The Politics and economics of sanctions against Russia. Centre for European Reform, March 2015. URL: https:// cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/ attachments/pdf/2015/frozen_sanctions-10787.pdf (accessed 25.06.2019)

18. Boucher A.J., Durch W., Rose S., Terry J. Mapping and Fighting Corruption in Wartom States. Washington, DC, Stimson Center, 2007, pp. 53-55.

19. Carisch E., Rickard-Martin L., Meister S.R. The Evolution of UN Sanctions: From a Tool of Warfare to a Tool of Peace, Security and Human Right. Springer, 2017. 256 p.

20. Carneiro C., Laerte A. Targeted Versus Conventional Economic Sanctions: What Is at Stake for Human Rights? International Interactions, 2016, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 565-89.

21. Chan S., Drury A. (Eds.). Sanctions as Economic Statecraſt. Theory and practice. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000.

22. Cortright D., Lopez G. The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s. Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 2000.

23. Drezner D.W. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraſt and International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

24. Fituni L., Abramova I. Crimes of the powerful and legitimization, in: Research Handbook on International Financial Crime. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. (UK), 2015. pp.51-62

25. Fuchs C. Critical Globalization Studies and the New Imperialism. Critical Sociology, 2010, vol. 36, no. 6, pp.839-867.

26. Gibbons E.U. Sanctions in Haiti: Human Rights and Democracy under Assault. Westport, Praeger, 1999.

27. Haass R.N. (Ed.). Economic Sanctions and American Diplomacy. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 1998.

28. Harrison G. Neoliberal Africa: The Impact of Global Social Engineering. London, New York, Zed Books, 2013.

29. Hufbauer G.C., Schott J.J., Elliott K.A., В Oegg. Economic Sanctions reconsidered: History and Current Policy, 3rd edition, Peterson Institute, November 2007.

30. Kaempfer W.H., Lowenberg A.D. The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach. American Economic Review, 1988, no. 78, pp, 786-793.

31. Lam S.L. Economic sanctions and the success of foreign policy goals: A critical evaluation. Japan and the World Economy, 1990, no. 2, pp. 239-248.

32. Lektzian D., Patterson D. Political Cleavages and Economic Sanctions: The Economic and Political Winners and Losers of Sanctions. International Studies Quarterly, 2015, no. 59, pp. 46-58.

33. Lindsay J. Trade Sanctions as Policy Instruments: A Re- Examination. International Studies Quarterly, 1986, no. 30, pp. 153-173.

34. Marinov N. Do economic sanctions destabilize country leaders? American Journal of Political Science, 2005, vol. 49, no. 3.

35. Marossi Ali Z., Bassett M.R. (eds.) Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences. The Hague & Berlin: Asser Press-Springer. 2015.

36. Mаu V. Russia needs reforms, not a sanctions war. Global Affairs, 25 September 2014. URL: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/ book/Russia-needs-reforms-not-a-sanctions-war-17006 (accessed 25.06.2019)

37. Moret E., Biersteker Th., Giumelli F., Portela C., Veber M., Bastiat-Jarosz D., Bobocea C. The New Deterrent? International sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine crisis: Impacts, costs and further action. Geneva. 2016

38. Narayan J., Sealey-Huggins L. Whatever happened to the idea of imperialism? Third World Quarterly, 2017, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2387-2395.

39. Nelson R. U.S. Sanctions and Russia's Economy. Congressional research service 7-5700, R43895. February 17, 2017. Washington DC. URL: https://fas. org/sgp/crs/row/R43895.pdf (accessed 25.06.2019)

40. Nicholson M. Imperialism, Post-Imperialism and Neo-Imperialism. International Relations. London, Palgrave, 1998.

41. Rikson M., Wallensteen P. Targeting sanctions and ending armed conflicts: First steps towards a research agenda. International Affairs. November 2015, vol. 91, issue 6, pp. 1387-1398.

42. Sanctions: Circumvention methods under scrutiny. Financial Crime Observer. PWC, November. 2016, pp. 1-4.

43. Van den Herik L. Peripheral Hegemony in the Quest to ensure Security Council Accountability for Its Individualized UN Sanctions Regimes’. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 427-449.

44. Van den Herik L. (ed.) Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law, 2017, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publ. (UK), 2017.


Review

For citations:


Fituni L.L. Targeted Sanctions: a Tool of Foreign Policy, Unfair Competition or Global Social Engineering? MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;(3(66)):17-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-3-66-17-41

Views: 1331


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)