Исследование мирных преобразований в условиях отсутствия демократии: пример советско-китайского сообщества безопасности
Аннотация
Ряд учёных полагает, что обязательной предпосылкой образования плюралистического сообщества безопасности является наличие демократического режима. Автор данной статьи утверждает, что изучение проблемы сообществ безопасности не всегда может опираться на логику положений теории демократического мира. Безусловно, демократические ценности, нормы, институты и практики способствуют формированию сообщества безопасности, но они ни в коей мере не являются единственной гарантией осуществления мирных перемен. В то время, как многие эксперты в последнее время приходят к такому же выводу, на сегодняшний день пока не было установлено, почему недемократические режимы могут формировать сообщества безопасности. В данной работе получает развитие идея о том, что причинно-следственные связи, обычно характерные для формирования демократических сообществ безопасности, характерны в равной мере и для недемократических сообществ безопасности. Положения статьи подкрепляются эмпирическими данными, основанными на изучении исторического кейса советско-китайских отношений. В общем и целом, автор приходит к выводам о том, что 1) демократия не является обязательной (хотя, безусловно, в существенной мере способствующей) предпосылкой развития плюралистического сообщества безопасности, 2) плюралистическое сообщество безопасности может быть образовано между автократическими режимами и может быть основано на транслировании вовне недемократических норм, идеологической связи, наличии общего Другого (исходя из нормативной логики) и автократических внутренних ограничениях (исходя из институциональной логики).
Об авторе
С. Кошут
Свободный Университет Берлина
Германия
Германия
Саймон Кошут – д. полит. н., научный сотрудник программы Гейзенберга. Институт политологии им. Отто Зура.
Ihnestr. 22, 14195 Berlin
Список литературы
1. Acharya A. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London, Routledge, 2001. 256 p.
2. Adler E. Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millenium. 1997, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 249-277. DOI: 10.1177/03058298970260021101
3. Adler E. Condition(s) of Peace. Review of International Studies. 1998, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 165-191.
4. Adler E., Barnett M. Security Communities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998. 483 p.
5. Adler E. The Spread of Security Communities. Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations. 2008, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 195-230. DOI: 10.1177/1354066108089241
6. Almond G. A., Verba S. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1963. 574 p.
7. Babst D.V. Elective Governments – A Force for Peace. The Wisconsin Sociologist. 1964, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-14.
8. Babst D.V. A Force for Peace. Industrial Research. 1972, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 55-58.
9. Bayer R. Peaceful Transition and Democracy. Journal of Peace Research. 2010, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 535-546.
10. Bellamy A.J. Security Communities and their Neighbors. Regional Fortresses or Global Integrators? New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 221 p.
11. Bennett D.S. Toward A Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection. International Studies Quarterly. 2006, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 313-338.
12. Bennett D.S., Stam A. The Behavorial Origins of War. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2004. 289 p.
13. Bueno de Mesquita B., Lalman D. War and Reason. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1992. 336 p.
14. Bueno de Mesquita B., Morrow J.D., Siverson R., Smith A. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review. 1999, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 791-812. DOI: 10.2307/2586113
15. Chernoff F. The Study of Democratic Peace and Progress in International Relations. International Studies Review. 2004, vol. 6, no. 1., pp. 49-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1079-1760.2004.00372.x
16. Cronin B. Community under Anarchy. Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York, Columbia University Press, 1999. 270 p.
17. Davenport C. State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace. Journal of Peace Research. 2007, vol. 44, no. 4., pp. 485-504. DOI: 10.1177/0022343307078940
18. Deutsch K.W. Political Community at the International Level. Problems of Definitions and Measurement. New York, Doubleday & Company, 1954. 69 p.
19. Deutsch K.W., Burrell S.A., et al. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1957. 228 p.
20. Deutsch K.W. Security Communities. International Politics and Foreign Policy. A Reader in Research and Theory. Ed. By J.N. Rosenau. New York, Free Press, 1961, pp. 98-105.
21. Dittmer L. Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications, 1945-1990. Seattle/London, University of Washington Press, 1992. 373 p.
22. Dixon W.J. Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict. American Political Science Review. 1994, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 14-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944879
23. Doyle M.W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Part 1. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1983, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205-235; Part 2. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 323-353.
24. Doyle M.W. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review. 1986, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1151-1169. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400185041
25. Doyle M.W. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. American Political Science Review. 2005, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 463-466. DOI: 10.1017/ S0003055405051798
26. Eberwein W.D. The Future of International Warefare: Toward a Global Security Community? International Political Science Review. 1995, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 341-360.
27. Elgström O., Jerneck M. Stable Peace: Conclusions and Extrapolations. Stable Peace Among Nations. Ed. By Kacowicz A.M. et al.. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 277-290.
28. Elman M.F. Unpacking Democracy: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Theories of Democratic Peace. Security Studies. 2000, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 91-126. DOI: 10.1080/09636410008429414
29. Fursenko A.A., Naftali T.J. Khrushchev’s Cold War. The Inside Story of an American Adversary. New York, NY, W. W. Norton & Company, 2006. 670 p.
30. Geddes B. Authoritarian Breakdown. Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument. Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1999. 114 p.
31. George A.L., Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2005. 331 p.
32. Gittings J. Survey of the Sino-Soviet Dispute, 1963-1967. London, Oxford University Press, 1968. 410 p.
33. Gleditsch N.P. Democracy and Peace. Journal of Peace Research. 1992, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 369-376.
34. Gleditsch N.P., Hegre H. Peace and Democracy: Three Levels of Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1997, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 283-310.
35. Goncharenko S. Sino-Soviet Military Cooperation. Brothers in Arms. The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance. Ed. by Westad O.A. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998, pp. 141-165.
36. Haas M.L. The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789-1989. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2005. 248 p.
37. Hammerstad A. Domestic Threats, Regional Solutions? The Challenge of Security Integration in Southern Africa. Review of International Studies. 2005, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 69-87. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210505006303
38. Harrison E. The Democratic Peace Research Program and System-Level Analysis. Journal of Peace Research. 2010, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 155-165. DOI: 10.1177/0022343309356490
39. Holsti K.J. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996. 272 p.
40. Hopf T. Identity Relations and the Sino-Soviet Split. Measuring Identity. Ed. by R. Abelal et al. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 279-315.
41. Huth P., Allen T.L. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 512 p.
42. Jiang C., Kuisong J. Chinese Politics and the Collapse of the Sino-Soviet Alliance. Brothers in Arms. The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance. Ed. by O. A. Westad. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998, pp. 246-295.
43. Kacowicz A.M. Zones of Peace in the Third World. South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective. New York, State University of New York Press, 1998. 282 p.
44. Kacowicz A.M., Bar-Siman-Tov Y., Elgström O. et al. Stable Peace Among Nations. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. 352 p.
45. Kaple D.A. Soviet Advisors in China in the 1950s. Brothers in Arms. The Rise and Fall of the SinoSoviet Alliance. Ed. by O. A. Westad. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998, pp. 117-140.
46. Kinsella D. No Rest for the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review. 2005, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 453-457. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055405051774
47. Kupchan C.A. How Enemies Become Friends. The Sources of Stable Peace. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2010. 448 p.
48. Lai B., Reiter D. Democracy, Political Similarity, and Alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 203-227. DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044002003
49. Lake D.A. Powerful Pacifists. Democratic States and War. American Political Science Review. 1992, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 24-37. DOI: 10.2307/1964013
50. Leifer M. ASEAN and the Security of South-East Asia. London: Routledge, 1989. 210 p.
51. Lektzian D., Souva M. A Comparative Theory Test of Democratic Peace Arguments, 1946- 2000. Journal of Peace Research. 2009, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 17-37.
52. Levy J.S. Domestic Politics and War. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 1988, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 653-673.
53. Lieberthal K. The Domestic Context of Chinese Foreign Policy. China's Foreign Relations in the 1980s. Ed. by H. Harding. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984, pp. 43-70.
54. Lijphart A., Karl W. Deutsch and the New Paradigm in International Relations. From National Development to Global Community. Essays in Honor of Karl W. Deutsch. Ed. by R. L. Merritt, B. M. Russett BM. London, George Allen & Unwin, 1981, pp. 233-251.
55. Linz J.J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 2000. 343 p.
56. Low A.D. The Sino-Soviet Dispute. An Analysis of the Polemics. London, Associated University Presses, 1976. 364 p.
57. Lüthi L.M. The Sino-Soviet Split. Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008. 400 p.
58. Lund M.S., Roig E. Southern Africa: An Emerging Security Community. Searching for Peace in Africa: An Overview of Conflict Prevention and Management Activities. Ed. by M. Mekenkamp, P. van Tongeren, H. van de Veen. Utrecht, European Centre for Conflict Prevention, 1999, pp. 391-395.
59. Maoz Z., Russett B.M. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review. 1993, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 624-638. DOI: 10.2307/2938740
60. Miller B. The International, Regional, and Domestic Sources of Regional Peace. Stable Peace Among Nations. Ed. by A. M. Kacowicz, Y. BarSiman-Tov, O. Elgström. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 55-74.
61. Miller B. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: the Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 500 p.
62. Morgan T.C., Campbell S. Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1991, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 187-211. DOI: 10.1177/0022002791035002003
63. Nathan L. Domestic Instability and Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations. 2006, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 275-299. DOI: 10.1177/1354066106064510
64. Ngoma N. SADC: Towards a Security Community? African Security Review. 2003, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1 7-28. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2003.9627230
65. Oneal J.R., Russett B.M. The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992. World Politics. 1999, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1-37. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887100020013
66. Oren I., Hays J. Democracies May Rarely Fight One Another, But Developed Socialist States Rarely Fight at All. Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance. 1997, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 493-521.
67. Owen J.M. Liberal Peace, Liberal War. American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997. 264 p.
68. Owen J.M. Pieces of Maximal Peace. Common Identities, Common Enemies. Stable Peace Among Nations. Ed. by A. M. Kacowicz, Y. BarSiman-Tov, O. Elgström. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 74-91.
69. Peceny M., Beer C.C., Sanchez-Terry S. Dictatorial Peace? American Political Science Review. 2002, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 15-26. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055402004203
70. Pouliot V. The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox. European Journal of International Relations. 2006, vol. 12 no. 1, pp. 119-127. DOI: 10.1177/1354066106061332
71. Pouliot V. Pacification Without Collective Identification: Russia and the Transatlantic Security Community in the Post-Cold War Era. Journal of Peace Research. 2007, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 605-622. DOI: 0.1177/0022343307080858
72. Radchenko S. Two Suns in the Heavens. The SinoSoviet Struggle for Supremacy, 1962-1967. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2009. 288 p.
73. Raknerud A., Hegre H. The Hazard of War: Reassessing the Evidence for the Democratic Peace. Journal of Peace Research. 1997, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 385-404. DOI: 10.1177/0022343397034004002
74. Ray J.L. Does Democracy Cause Peace? Annual Review of Political Science. 1998, vol. 1, pp. 27-46.
75. Ray J.L. Exploring the Bargaining Model of War. Perspectives on Politics. 2003, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27- 44. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592703000033
76. Ray J.L. Constructing Multivariate Analyses (Of Dangerous Dyads). Conflict Management and Peace Science. 2005, vol. 22, pp. 277-292. DOI: 10.1080/07388940500339175
77. Risse-Kappen T. Democratic Peace – Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument. European Journal of International Relations. 1995, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 491-517. DOI: 10.1177/1354066195001004005
78. Risse-Kappen T. Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO. The Culture of National Security. Ed. by P.J. Katzenstein New York, Columbia University Press, 1996, pp. 357-399.
79. Robinson T. China Confronts the Soviet Union. The Cambridge History of China. Ed. by R. MacFarquhar, J.K. Fairbank, D. Twitchett. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 218-304.
80. Rosato S. The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory. American Political Science Review. 2003, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 585-602. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055403000893
81. Rosato S. Explaining the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review. 2005, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 467-472. DOI: 10.1017/ S0003055405051804
82. Rosecrance R. The Rise of the Trading State. Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York, Basic Books, 1986. 268 p.
83. Rüland J. Deepening ASEAN Cooperation through Democratization? The Indonesian Legislature and Foreign Policymaking. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2009, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 373-402. DOI: 10.1093/irap/lcp010
84. Rummel R.J. Libertarianism and International Violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1983, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 27-71. DOI: 10.1177/0022002783027001002
85. Russett B.M. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Ewing, Princeton University Press, 1993. 192 p.
86. Scalapino R. Containment and Countercontainment: The Current Stage of Sino-Soviet Relations. The Current Stage of Sino-Soviet Relations. China, the Soviet Union, and the West. Ed. By D. Stuart, W. Tow. Boulder, Westview, 1982, pp. 173-185.
87. Selebi J. Building Collaborative Security in Southern Africa. African Security Review. 1999, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3-12.
88. Shaw T.M. African Renaissance/African Alliance: Towards New Regionalisms and New Realism in the Great Lakes at the Start of the Twenty-First Century. Politeia. 1998, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 60-74.
89. Slantchev B.L., Alexandrova A., Gartzke E. Probability Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review. 2005, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 459-462.
90. Slantchev B.L. Politicians, the Media and Domestic Audience Costs. International Studies Quarterly. 2006, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 445-477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00409.x
91. Small M., Singer D.J. The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816-1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations. 1976, vol. 1, pp. 50-69.
92. Souva M. Institutional Similarity and Interstate Conflict. International Interactions. 2004, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 263-280. DOI: 10.1080/03050620490492213
93. Starr H. Democracy and War: Choice, Learning and Security Communities. Journal of Peace Research. 1992, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 207-213. DOI: 10.1177/0022343392029002007
94. Starr H. Democracy and Integration: Why Democracies Don’t Fight Each Other. Journal of Peace Research. 1997, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 153-162. DOI: 10.1177/0022343397034002003
95. Stubbs R. The ASEAN Alternative? Ideas, Institutions and the Challenge to ‘Global’ Governance. The Pacific Review. 2008, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 451- 468. DOI: 10.1080/09512740802294713
96. Treadgold D.W. Alternative Western Views of the Sino-Soviet Conflict. The Sino-Soviet Conflict. A Global Perspective. Ed. by Ellison H. J. Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1982, pp. 325- 355.
97. Vasquez J.A. Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction, or Territoriality. Journal of Peace Research. 1995, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 277-293. DOI: 10.1177/0022343395032003003
98. Väyrynen R. Stable Peace Through Security Communities: Steps Towards Theory-building. Stable Peace Among Nations. Ed. by A. M. Kacowicz, Y. Bar-Siman-Tov, O. Elgström. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 108-129.
99. Walt S.M. Revolution and War. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1996, 376 p.
100. Weeks J.L. Autocratic Audience Costs. Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization. 2008, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 35-64. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818308080028
101. Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999. 450 p.
102. Werner S. The Effects of Political Similarity on the Onset of Militarized Disputes, 1816-1985. Political Science Quarterly. 2000, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 343-374. DOI: 10.1177/106591290005300207
103. Werner S., Lemke D. Opposites Do Not Attract: The Impact of Domestic Institutions, Power, and Prior Commitments on Alignment Choices. International Studies Quarterly. 1997, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 529-546.
104. Westad O.A. Brothers in Arms. The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998. 404 p.
105. Williams M.C. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations. 2001, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 525-553. DOI: 10.1177/1354066101007004006
106. Zagoria D. The Sino-Soviet Conflict, 1956-61. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1962. 498 p.
107. Zhang S.G. Sino-Soviet Economic Cooperation. Brothers in Arms. The Rise and Fall of the SinoSoviet Alliance. Ed. by O.A. Westad. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998, pp.189-226.
Для цитирования:
Кошут С. Исследование мирных преобразований в условиях отсутствия демократии: пример советско-китайского сообщества безопасности. Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2019;65(2):7-31. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-7-31
For citation:
Koschut S. Explaining Peaceful Change without Democracy: The Case of the Sino-Soviet Security Community. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;65(2):7-31. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-7-31
Просмотров: 95
Послать статью по эл. почте 