Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

THE PROBLEM OF WORLD ORDER IN WESTERN IR STUDIES

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-5-50-34-47

Abstract

The article "Problem of world order in modern Western studies" is the study of one of the most debated issues in the science of international relations - world order. Discussion of the structure of world order is underway in various countries, both at the state level and in the expert community. Some researchers insist on the fact that after the end of the cold war, the collapse of the bipolar model of international relations, the world has become unipolar. Others argue that the increase in the number of centers of power and the need for a multilateral approach to solving global problems (terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, environmental and climate issues) talking about the formation of multipolarity. However, it should be recognized that currently no widely accepted theoretical and conceptual apparatus, which complicates not only the study of the world order, but makes it impossible to search for common approaches of the international community in solving the problems associated with global development, new challenges and threats. The author of this article seeks to research and analyze the various theoretical paradigms (neo-realism, neo-liberalism, institutionalism, neo-marxism, etc.) and concepts to form a coherent picture of the structure of the world system, its main features and to offer readers the vision of the concept of "world order". Thus, the article notes that the multidimensional structure of the modern system of international relations established after the end of the cold war is so complex that none of the concepts can claim to accurate interpretation of the world order. The modern system differs from systems of the past centuries. Characteristics inherent in it (on the one hand, the increasing global processes in economy, politics, culture, etc., on the other, the attraction to return to the concept of "nation state", the closure of borders, the disintegration), require new approaches to the study of world order, factors of its formation and its components. The world system is dynamic and none of the previously existing concepts of world order are not able to accurately describe the processes occurring in the world today. For example, a bipolar model is formed based on the principle of "balance of power", a unipolar system exists on the basis of the dictates of the powers, and a multipolar - subject to the availability of the political equilibrium. It becomes obvious that the constantly changing conditions in the global arena require a whole new approach to the formation of a genuine world order. While each country will be guided by their own ideas of the world development plan focused on their interests, often in conflict with the global balance of power, to speak of a stable, efficient, safe development is impossible.

About the Author

M. V. Soljanova
Institute for the U.S. and Canadian studies of the Russian academy of sciences
Russian Federation

research assistant in the Center for Russian-American relations,

123995, Moscow, G-69, Khlebny per. 2/3



References

1. Vallerstain I. Analiz mirovykh sistem: sovremennoe sistemnoe videnie mirovogo soobshchestva [Analysis of world-systems: the current systemic vision of the world community]. Sotsiologiia na poroge XXI veka: novye napravleniia issledovanii [Sociology at the threshold of the XXI century: new directions of research]. Ed. by S.I. Grigor'ev, Zh. Koenen-Khutter. Moscow, Intellekt Publ., 1998. 272 p. (In Russian).

2. Vallerstain I. Analiz mirovykh sistem i situatsiia v sovremennom mire [Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world]. / Transl. by P. M. Kudiukin, ed. by B. Iu. Kagarlitskiy. St. Petersburg, Universitetskaia kniga Publ., 2001. 416 p. (In Russian).

3. Wallerstein I. The End of the World As We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-first Century. Univ. Of Minnesota Press Publ., 2001. 288 p. (Russ. ed.: Vallerstain I. Konets znakomogo mira: Sotsiologiia XXI veka / Vozvyshenie Vostochnoi Azii, ili Miro - sistema v XXI veke. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004. 368 p.)

4. Vendt A. Chetyre sotsiologii mezhdunarodnoi politiki [Four sociologies of international policy]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia: sotsiologicheskie podkhody [International relations: sociological approaches]. Ed. by P.A. Tsygankov. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 1998. 352 p. (In Russian).

5. Kissindzher: «Dostignem li my mirovogo poriadka cherez khaos ili ponimanie?» [Whether we reach the world order through chaos or understanding?]. IA REGNUM, 13.11.2014. Available at: http://www.regnum. ru/news/1866603.html (Accessed: 20.10.2016). (In Russian).

6. Henry Kissinger. Does America Need a Foreign Policy?: Toward a New Diplomacy for the 21st Century. Simon & Schuster, 2001. 352 p.; 1st ed. (Oct. 18). (Russ. ed.: Kissindzher G. Nuzhna li Amerike vneshniaia politika? K diplomatii dlia XXI veka. Transl., ed. by V.L. Inozemtsov. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 2002. 352 p.)

7. Kupchan Charles A. The End Of American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-first Century. Vintage, 2003. 416 p. (Russ. ed.: Kapkhen Ch. Zakat Ameriki. Uzhe skoro. / Transl. by B. Syrkov. Moscow, AST, Liuks Publ., 2004. 636 p.)

8. Jacobsen H.-A. 1939-1945. Der Zweite Weltkrieg in Chronik und Documenten. Darmstadt, Wehr-und-Wissen Verlagsgesselschaft, 1959. 552 S. (Russ. ed.: Teilor A., Iakobsen, G.-A. Vtoraia mirovaia voina: Dva vzgliada. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1995. 560 p.)

9. Jürgen Habermas. Der gespaltene Westen. Kleine politische Schriften. Verlag: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2004. 208 S. (Russ. ed.: Khabermas Iu. Raskolotyi Zapad. / Transl. by O.I. Velichko, E.L. Petrenko. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir» Publ., 2008. 192 p.)

10. Barnett T. The New Rules: The New World Order-After-Next. World Politics Review, 25.07.2011. Available at: http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/9568/the-new-rules-the-new-world-order-after-next (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

11. Brzezinski Z. Between the Two Ages. N.Y., Penguin Books, 1976. 352 p.

12. Busan B., Jones C., Little R. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to structural Realism. N.Y., New Directions in World Politics, 1993. 267 p.

13. Chomsky N., Achcar G. Perilous Power. The Middle East and US Foreign Policy. Dialogues on Terror, Democracy, War, and Justice. Routledge, 2006. 288 p.

14. Haass R.N. The Squandered Presidency: Demanding More from the Commander-in-Chief. Foreign Affairs. 2000. May/June. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2000-05-01/squandered-presidencydemanding-more-commander-chief (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

15. Huntington S. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs. 1999. Mar./Apr. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1999-03-01/lonely-superpower (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

16. Huntington S.P. Why International Primacy Matters. International Security, vol. 17, no. 4 (Spring, 1993), pp. 68-83.

17. Ikenberry J. America’s Imperial Ambition. Foreign Affairs. 2002. Sept./Oct. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2002-09-01/americas-imperial-ambition (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

18. Ikenbery J. The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs. January/February 2008. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2008-01-01/rise-chinaand-future-west (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

19. Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Afghan War and «The Grand Chessboard». The RealNews.com, 13.01.2010. Available at: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4695#newsletter1 (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

20. Kagan R. The Benevolent Empire. Foreign Policy, 1998, No. 111. Summer. Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/1998/05/31/benevolent-empire-pub-275 (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

21. Kegley C. and Raymond G. A Multipolar Peace? Great Powers Politics in the 21st Century. N.Y.: St. Martin's Press, 1994. 320 p.

22. Keohane R. Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond. Political Science: The State of a Discipline. Washington, 1983. Pp. 158-203.

23. Keohane R.O., Nye Jr. Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What?). Foreign Policy, no. 118 (Spring, 2000), pp. 104-119.

24. Kissinger H. How to exit Afghanistan without creating wider conflict. The Washington Post, 07.07.2011. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-to-exit-afghanistan-without-creating-widerconflict/2011/06/06/AG9ydPLH_story.html (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

25. Kissinger H. World Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2014. 432 p.

26. Krauthammer Ch. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 1. America and the World 1990/1991. 1991. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1991-02-01/unipolar-moment (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

27. Kupchan Ch. After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity. International Security, no. 2, 1998, pp. 40-79.

28. Kupchan Ch. Life after Pax Americana. World Policy Journal, vol. 16, no. 3 (Fall, 1999), pp. 20-27.

29. Layne Ch. The Unipolar Illusion. Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, vol. 17, no. 4 (Spring, 1993), pp. 5-51.

30. Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 2001. 555 p.

31. Monteiro N. Theory of Unipolar Politics. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, 2014. 260 p.

32. Nye J. The New Rome Meets New Barbarians: How America Should Wield Its Power. The Economist, 23.03.2002. Available at: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1172/new_rome_meets_the_new_barbarians. html (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

33. Rosenau J.N. Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, vol. 1, no. 1 (Winter 1995), pp. 13-43.

34. Waltz K. Globalization and American Power. The National Interest, no. 59 (Spring 2000), pp. 46-56.

35. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. Reading, 1979. 256 p.

36. Wohlforth W. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, Summer 1999, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5-41.

37. Wohlforth W., Brooks S. The Once and Future Superpower. Why China Won’t Overtake the United States. Foreign Affairs. May/June 2016. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-04-13/ once-and-future-superpower (Accessed: 20.10.2016).

38. Zakaria F. The Challenges of American Hegemony. International Journal, vol. 54, no. 1 (Winter, 1998/1999), pp. 9-27.


Review

For citations:


Soljanova M.V. THE PROBLEM OF WORLD ORDER IN WESTERN IR STUDIES. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(5(50)):34-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-5-50-34-47

Views: 2825


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)