Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

THE CAUCASIAN DIMENSION OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IN 2009-2016

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-199-208

Abstract

The paper gives an in-depth analysis of the evolution of the EU policy towards the South Caucasus within the framework of the Eastern Partnership. It is amply demonstrated that in 2009-2016 the goal was a Europeanization as a creation of a favorable external environment for the European Union through a sweeping judiciary, economic and political transformation in the region carried out according to the European standards. Among the key objectives of the European Union policy is the maintenance of energy security by means of creating an alternative transport corridor for fossil fuels. The study underscores that the implementation of the Eastern Partnership in 2009-2013 revealed significant discrepancies in the speed and degree of Europeanization in the South Caucasus countries due to their socio-economic peculiarities. Such uneven transformation reflects the long-standing search for an optimum way of cooperation with the European Union. This complex multi-aspect and long-term process constitutes an integral part of the effort to grasp new national and regional identities made by post-Soviet states. The paper thoroughly analyses the distinctive features of the new EU foreign policy strategy characterized by a differentiated approach to each country. Instead of the former irreciprocal statement of prerequisites for cooperation, such an approach paves the way for meaningful bilateral dialogue between the partners and furthers integration just to the extent they are ready for. Yet, it is shown that this strategy preserved the faults of the former EU regional policy towards the post-Soviet space. They include inconsistency, vague objectives, and emphasis on the geopolitical confrontation with Russia. However, in order to promote the stable development of the region, the EU needs to rethink its foreign policy strategy and come up with a modernized framework of cooperation that would take into account the interests of all concerned parties, including the Russian Federation.

About the Author

P. A. Barakhvostov
Belorussian State University
Belarus

Phd student of the Department of diplomatic and consular service at the Faculty of international relations,

20 Leningradskaya St, Minsk, 220030



References

1. Александр Искандарян: выбирая между ЕС и ТС, Армения выбрала ОДКБ // Вестник Кавказа URL: http://www.vestikavkaza.ru/news/Aleksandr-Iskandaryan-vybiraya-mezhdu-ES-i-TS-Armeniya-vybrala-ODKB.html(проверено 15.03.2016).

2. Ахметели Н. Грузия приветствует доклад Еврокомиссии об отмене виз // Русская служба BBC URL: http://www.bbc.com/russian/international/2015/12/151219_georgia_eu_visas (проверено 14.03.2016).

3. Болгова И.В. Политика Европейского союза на Южном Кавказе // Кавказский сборник. 2008. Т.5. С. 338-350.

4. Восточное партнерство: Сообщение Европейской комиссии для Европейского парламента и Европейского совета: док. COM (2008) 823 final, Брюссель, 03.12.08 // European External Action Service URL: http://eeas.europa.eu/eastern/docs/com08_823_ru.pdf (проверено 12.04.2016).

5. Гриневецкий С.Р., Жильцов С.С., Зонн И.С. Геополитическое казино Причерноморья. М.: Восток – Запад, 2009. 351 с.

6. Гусейнов В.А. Южный Кавказ: тенденции и проблемы развития (1992-2008 гг.) / под ред. В.А. Гусейнова. М.: Красная звезда, 2008. 392 с.

7. Мелик-Шахназаров А. Нагорный Карабах: факты против лжи. Информационно-идеологические аспекты нагорно-карабахского конфликта. М.: Волшебный фонарь, 2009. 768 с.

8. Меликян Дж. Армения и Евразийский союз: от сотрудничества до интеграции// Аналитические записки Института Кавказа, февраль 2015 URL: http://c-i.am/wp-content/uploads/policy-brief-02_2015_ru.pdf (проверено 10.04.2016).

9. Мендкович Н. Последствия ассоциации с ЕС для Грузии//Научное общество кавказоведов URL: http://www.kavkazoved.info/news/2014/07/02/posledstvia-associacii-s-es-dlya-gruzii.html (проверено 02.02.2016).

10. Рамочный договор станет основой политических и экономических отношений между Арменией и ЕС – посол // Новости- Армения URL: http://newsarmenia.am/news/politics/ramochnyy-dogovor-stanetosnovoy-politicheskikh-i-ekonomicheskikh-otnosheniy-mezhdu-armeniey-i-es-po/ (проверено14.03.2016).

11. Результаты опроса общественного мнения в Грузии // Кавказ online URL: http://kavkasia.net/Georgia/2015/1450730167.php (проверено 14.03.2016).

12. Соглашение о партнёрстве и сотрудничестве между ЕС и Азербайджаном 1996 г. // Московская государственная юридическая академия URL: http://eulaw.edu.ru/documents/legislation/eea/pca_azer.htm (проверено 11.03.2016).

13. Соглашение о партнёрстве и сотрудничестве между ЕС и Арменией 1996 г. // Московская государственная юридическая академия URL: http://eulaw.edu.ru/documents/legislation/eea/pca_armenia.htm (проверено 11.03.2016).

14. Соглашение о партнёрстве и сотрудничестве между ЕС и Грузией 1996 г. // Московская государственная юридическая академия URL: http://eulaw.edu.ru/documents/legislation/eea/pca_georgia.htm (проверено 11.03.2016).

15. Чернявский С. 10 лет истории Азербайджана (2003 – 2013 гг.). М.: ФЛИНТА, 2013, 416 с.

16. «Южный газовый коридор» - один из крупнейших проектов современности// Trend URL: http://www.trend.az/business/energy/2509193.html (проверено 18.03.2016).

17. Юматов К. Эволюция политики Европейского союза на Южном Кавказе// Вести Томского Государственного Университета. 2012. №1. С. 127-131.

18. Alexeicius S.-D., Babichenko K.N. The EU’s Neighborhood policy to-wards the Southern Caucasus: searching for commonality in a patchy scenario// Baltic Journal of Law and Politics. 2013. Vol.6. No 2. Pp. 75-101.

19. Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part//Official Journal of the European Union URL: http://eeas.europa.eu/georgia/pdf/eu-ge_aa-dcfta_en.pdf (проверено 15.02.2016).

20. Bishku M.B. The South Caucasus Republics: relations with U.S. and EU // Middle East Policy. 2015. Vol. 22. Pp. 40-57.

21. European Union, Trade in goods with Azerbaijan // European Comission URL: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113347.pdf (проверено 16.03.2016).

22. Georgia’s 2015 Foreign Trade URL: http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=28924 (проверено 15.03.2016).

23. Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Armenia. Progress in 2014 and recommendations for actions: Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Сouncil, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions // EC Doc. SWD (2015) 63 final. - Brussels, 25.03.2015.

24. OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin URL: http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/ASB2015.pdf (проверено 16.03.2016).

25. Pardo Sierra O.B. No man’s land? A comparative analysis of the EU and Russia’s influence in the Southern Caucasus// Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2011. Vol. 44. Pp. 233-243.

26. Simão L. The problematic role of EU democracy promotion in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2012. Vol. 45. Pp. 193-200.

27. The 2015 ENP package «Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2014»// Official Journal of the European Union URL: http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/documents/progress-reports/index_en.htm (проверено 15.02.2016)


Review

For citations:


Barakhvostov P.A. THE CAUCASIAN DIMENSION OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IN 2009-2016. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(4(49)):199-208. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-199-208

Views: 932


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)