INNOVATION PRODUCTION MODELS
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-3-48-54-65
Abstract
About the Author
T. N. GuseinovaRussian Federation
investment analyst,
32A Leninsky prospect, Moscow 119991
References
1. Glazev S. Ju. Sovremennaja teorija dlinnyh voln v razvitii jekonomiki [Modern theory of long waves of economic development]. Sergey Glazev’s official web-site. Available at: http://www.glazev.ru/upload/iblock/77b/77b8141cdfc1038b78520f79fc9acd40.pdf (Accessed 09.05.2016) (In Russian).
2. Gorohova A.E. Povyshenie jeffektivnosti promyshlennyh predprijatij v uslovijah transformacii nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy [Improvement of efficiency of industrial enterprises under transformation of national innovation system]. Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 346 p. Available at: http://www.rusacad.ru/docs/disertsovet/zashiti/GorohovaAE/disser_GorohovaAE.pdf (Accessed 10.05.2016) (In Russian).
3. Kasenov R. R. Model' nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy [Model of national innovation system]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 32 (323). Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/model-natsionalnoy-innovatsionnoy-sistemy (Accessed 10.05.2016) (In Russian).
4. Kovalevich D. A., Shhedrovickij P. G. Konvejer innovacij [Innovation conveyor belt]. Agentstvo strategicheskih iniciativ. Available at: http://asi.ru/conveyor-of-innovations/ (Accessed 27.04.2016) (In Russian).
5. Medovnikov D., Rozmirovich S., Saraev V. Zhrebij eshhe ne broshen [The die is not yet cast]. Jekspert, 2012, no. 2, p. 36. (In Russian).
6. Sergeev V. M., Alekseenkova E. S., Nechaev V. D. Tipologija modelej innovacionnogo razvitija [Typology of models of innovation development]. Politija, 2008, no. 4, pp. 6-22. (In Russian).
7. Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 1999, 10(1), рр. 43-68.
8. Bakhshi H. et al. The geography of the UK’s creative and high–tech economies. Nesta, 2015. Available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/geography_uks_creative_high-tech_economieswv20151.pdf (Accessed 09.06.2016) (In Russian).
9. Bianchi M., Cavaliere A. Chiaroni D., Frattini F., Chiesa V. Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 2011, no. 31(1), рр. 22-33.
10. Birkinshaw J., Gibson C. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2004, vol. 45, no.4, рр. 47-55.
11. Callaway S. K., Hamilton R. Managing disruptive technology—Internet banking ventures for traditional banks. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2008, no. 5(01), рр. 55-80.
12. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. 'Mode 3'and'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, no. 46(3-4), рр. 201-234.
13. Chen E. L., Katila R. Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation: Simultaneous or sequential? Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, 2008, рр. 197-201.
14. Creation of tech-based companies debated in COHiTEC’s closing session. Technology Commercialization Accelerator. Available at: https://www.actbycotec.com/en/media.104/news.105/creation_of_tech-based_companies_debated_in_cohitec_s_closing_session.a562.html (Accessed 10.05.2016).
15. Datta A. Review and extension on ambidexterity: A theoretical model integrating networks and absorptive capacity. Journal of Management and Strategy. 2011, no. 2(1), pp. 2-22.
16. Dutta S. K. Dynamic Capabilities: Fostering Ambidexterity. Journal of Indian Management, 2012, no. 9(2), рр. 81-91.
17. Ferrary M. Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm. European Management Journal, 2011, no. 29(3), рр. 181-192.
18. Graves A. Comparative Trends in Automotive Research and Development. DRC Discussion Paper, No. 54, Science Policy Research Unit, Sussex University, Brighton, Sussex, 1987. 42 p.
19. Hoang H. A., Rothaermel F. T. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, no. 31(7), рр. 734-758.
20. Isaacson W. The exclusive Biography of Steve Jobs. Little Brown Book Group, 2011. 656 p.
21. Meissner D., Kotsemir M. Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ‘active innovation paradigm’— trends and outlook. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2016, no. 5(1), 18 p.
22. Mowery D., Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research policy, 1979, no. 8(2), рр. 102-153.
23. Myint Y. M., Vyakarnam S., New M. J. The effect of social capital in new venture creation: the Cambridge high‐technology cluster. Strategic Change, 2005, no. 14(3), рр. 165-177.
24. O'Reilly C. A., Harreld J. B., Tushman M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 2009, no. 51(4), рр. 75-99.
25. O’Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 2004, no. 82(4), рр. 74-83.
26. Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41 (1), рр. 116-145.
27. Rohrbeck R., Gemünden H. G. Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2011, no. 78(2), рр. 231–243.
28. Rothwell R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International marketing review, 1994, no. 11(1), рр. 7-31.
29. Schilling M. A. Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. McGraw-Hill Education, 2013. 336 p.
30. Simsek Z., Heavey C., Veiga J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies. 2009, no. 46(5), рр. 864-894.
31. Stettner U., Lavie D. Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, no. 35(13), рр. 1903-1929.
32. Westerman G., McFarlan F. W., Iansiti M. Organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organization Science, 2006, no. 17(2), рр. 230-238.
33. Zegveld W., Rothwell R. Reindustrialization and Technology. Longman, Harlow, 1985. 282 p.
Review
For citations:
Guseinova T.N. INNOVATION PRODUCTION MODELS. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(3(48)):54-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-3-48-54-65