Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

THE PERSPECTIVES OF INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF PRIVATE MILITARY AND SECURITY COMPANIES’

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-145-160

Abstract

Modern international security is a heterogeneous sphere that includes both state and nonstate actors. Legal status of some non-state actors is not always clear. This can be attributed mostly to the dynamics of the global processes. The emergence of new actors, their fast transformation and shift from old forms of activity to the new ones often outpace political and legal assessment of their nature, the impact on some other international trends and the implications of their use that may arise. States and international organizations together with business and non-governmental foundations have started to turn to private security actors more frequently. The fact that traditional methods of state violence are complemented by non-traditional forms influences the idea of violence in the society at large. The efficiency of non-state security actors and the speed they provide services with sometimes exceed the ones of civil servants' and outmaneuver state machine. However these advantages do not contribute to the legitimacy of these non-state actors. As a result during a certain period of time, sometimes a significant one, new actors perform having just a partial legitimacy and a vague accoun tability. Various approaches towards regulation of the abovementioned actors within the framework of national and regional legislation clarify their status in a way. But these measures are not enough for them to obtain legal status under the International Law so far. To address the problem a complex approach that would combine the existing International Law mechanisms with the developing self-regulation methods is needed.

About the Authors

M. A. Nebolsina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

researcher at the Center for Euro-Atlantic security of the International Studies Institute,

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



A. I. Nikitin
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

PhD in Political Science, Professor at the Department for Political Studies of MGIMOUniversity, Director for the Center for Euro-Atlantic security of the International Studies Institute,

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.

2. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977.

3. Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.

4. Kornilov N. Private military and security business gains momentum – the UN // Center for strategic environment. 12.11.2013. Available at: http://conjuncture.ru/un-12-11-2013/ (Accessed: 18.05.2015). (In Russian)

5. Nebolsina M. The phenomenon of private military and security companies: addressing the issue of legitimacy // ISI Yearbook, 2014, no. 3–4, pp. 196–205. (In Russian)

6. Avant D. Overview: Current Global Manifestations of the Mercenary Phenomenon. Paper prepared for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Third Expert meeting on mercenaries, 6–10 December, 2004.

7. Dormann K., The legal situation of “unlawful/ unprivileged combatants” // International Red Cross Review, vol. 86, no. 849, March 2003, pp. 45–74.

8. Draft ICoCA Certification Principles and Procedures, Certification of individual companies. Available at: http://www.icoca.ch/sites/default/files/resources/Final%20Draft%20ICoCA%20Certification%20Procedure.pdf (Accessed: 13.03.2015).

9. Draft Charter of the Oversight Mechanism for the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Services Providers, IX. Performance Assessment Criteria and Procedures.

10. Gillard E.-C. Business goes to war: private military/security companies and international humanitarian law. ICRC Review, vol. 88, no. 863, September 2006. Pp. 525 - 572. Available at: https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/article/review/review-863-p525.htm (Accessed: 13.03.2016).

11. Herbst K. Searching for legitimacy – Private military and security companies (PMSCs) overcoming ingrained stereotypes. Security Journal, May 2013, no. 26, pp. 280–293. Available at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/sj/journal/v26/n3/full/sj201317a.html (Accessed: 13.03.2016).

12. Howe Herbert M. Ambiguous Order: Military Forces in African States. London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001. 188 p.

13. ICoCA Board Meeting. 7 & 9 October 2015. Available at: http://icoca.ch/sites/default/files/resources/Minutes%20Q3%202015%20-%207-9%20October%20-%20Board%20Meetings.pdf (Accessed: 13.03.2015).

14. International Committee of Red Cross, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, Adopted by the Assembly of the International Committee of the Red Cross on 26 February 2009.

15. International humanitarian law and private military / security companies, ICRC, 15.08.2012. URL.: http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/faq/pmsc-faq-150908.htm (accessed: 13.03.2016).

16. Just War as Political Theory: Intention, Cause and Authority. Political Theory, April 2016, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 289–303. Available at: http://ptx.sagepub.com/content/44/2/289.full.pdf+html (Accessed: 21.03.2016).

17. Kinsey C. Private Security Companies: Agents of Democracy or Simply Mercenaries?. Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects. Jäger T. and Kümmel G. (eds). Vs Verlag, February 2007, pp. 87–104.

18. O'Brien Kevin A. PMCs, Myths and Mercenaries: The Debate on Private Military Companies. Royal United Service Institute Journal, Feb 2000, vol. 145, no.1, pp. 59 – 64.

19. Owens P. Distinctions, distinctions: ‘public’ and ‘private’ force? International Affairs, September 2008, vol. 84, iss. 5, pp. 977 – 990. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00750.x/pdf (Accessed: 21.03.2016).

20. Recchia S. Reassuring the reluctant warriors: US civil–military relations and multilateral intervention. International Affairs, March 2016, vol. 92, iss. 2, pp. 501 – 502. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2346.12592/full (Accessed: 21.03.2016).

21. Rosemann N. Code of Conduct: Tool for Self-Regulation for Private Military and Security Companies. Occasional Paper, 2008, no. 15. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). Available at: http://dcaf.ch/Publications/Code-of-Conduct-Tool-for-Self-Regulation-for-Private-Military-and-SecurityCompanies (Accessed: 12.03.2016).

22. Spoerri Ph. The Montreux Document. Private Military and Security Companies. 35-th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law. Session 1: Status and Interrelation of Major Standards. Setting Initiatives. San Remo, 6–8 September 2012 // Available at: http://psm.du.edu/media/documents/reports_and_stats/think_tanks/iihl_spoerri_montreux.pdf (Accessed: 12.03.2016).

23. The Articles of Association of The International Code of Conduct. Available at: http://www.icoca.ch/en/articles_of_association (Accessed: 02.03.2016)

24. The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers. Available at: http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/topics/intla/humlaw/pse/coc.html (Accessed: 23.07.2015).

25. The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers. Academy briefing, 2013, no. 4. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Available at: http://www.genevaacademy.ch/docs/publications/briefing4_web_final.pdf (Accessed: 13.03.2016).

26. The Montreux Document on pertinent international legal obligations and good practices for States related to operations of private military and security companies during armed conflict. Available at: https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf (Accessed: 13.03.2016).


Review

For citations:


Nebolsina M.A., Nikitin A.I. THE PERSPECTIVES OF INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF PRIVATE MILITARY AND SECURITY COMPANIES’. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(2(47)):145-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-145-160

Views: 1856


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)