Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Methods and Models of Market Risk Stress-Testing of the Portfolio of Financial Instruments

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-4-43-53-63

Abstract

Amid instability of financial markets and macroeconomic situation the necessity of improving bank risk-management instrument arises. New economic reality defines the need for searching for more advanced approaches of estimating banks vulnerability to exceptional, but plausible events. Stress-testing belongs to such instruments. The paper reviews and compares the models of market risk stress-testing of the portfolio of different financial instruments. These days the topic of the paper is highly acute due to the fact that now stress-testing is becoming an integral part of anticrisis risk-management amid macroeconomic instability and appearance of new risks together with close interest to the problem of risk-aggregation. The paper outlines the notion of stress-testing and gives coverage of goals, functions of stress-tests and main criteria for market risk stress-testing classification. The paper also stresses special aspects of scenario analysis. Novelty of the research is explained by elaborating the programme of aggregated complex multifactor stress-testing of the portfolio risk based on scenario analysis. The paper highlights modern Russian and foreign models of stress-testing both on solo-basis and complex. The paper lays emphasis on the results of stress-testing and revaluations of positions for all three complex models: methodology of the Central Bank of stress-testing portfolio risk, model relying on correlations analysis and copula model. The models of stress-testing on solo-basis are different for each financial instrument. Parametric StressVaR model is applicable to shares and options stress-testing;model based on "Grek" indicators is used for options; for euroobligation regional factor model is used. Finally some theoretical recommendations about managing market risk of the portfolio are given.

About the Authors

A. M. Karminsky
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation


E. V. Seryakova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Андриевская И.К. Стресс-тестирование:обзор методологий// Государственный университет - Высшая школа экономики, 2007. 13 c.

2. Буренин А.Н. Форвардные,фьючерсные и опционные рынки. Учебник.М.: Научно-техническое общество имени академика С. И. Вавилова. 2015, 339 c.

3. Котировки финансовых инструментов. Информационное агентство Блумберг http://www.bloomberg.com.

4. Лобанов А. Проблема метода при расчёте Value at Risk //Рынок ценных бумаг. 2000 , №21, С. 54-58.

5. Методика моделирования достаточности капитала:стресс-тестирование. М.: Ассоциация российских банков. 2013, 83 c.

6. Наталуха И.Г. Оптимальные портфельные решения при наличии скачков цен рисковых активов//Современная экономика:проблемы и решения. М., 2010, №4. C 140-148.

7. Общие вопросы организации процесса внутренней оценки достаточности капитала (ВПОДК). М.: Ассоциация российских банков. 2013. 49 c.

8. Риск-менеджмент в коммерческом банке: монография / коллектив авторов; под ред. И.В.Ларионовой. - М.: Ассоциация российских банков: КНОРУС. 2014. 456 c.

9. Стресс-тестирование торгового и инвестиционного портфелей ценных бумаг в соответствии с рекомендациями Банка России (вебинар) http://www.ideal.ru/nwsinf.asp?NP=1&Count=25&Year=2015&id=131.

10. Энциклопедия финансового риск-менеджмента /Под ред. А.А. Лобанова и А.В. Чугунова. Учебник. М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2003, 785 c.

11. Financial Risk Manager (FRM) Exam Part 1: Quantitative analysis. USA. GARP. 2015. 328 p.

12. Guidelines on Stress Testing (GL 32). Committee of European banking supervisors (CEBS). 2010. 55 p.

13. Hull J. Options, Futures and other Derivatives. Handbook. USA. Prentice Hall. 2006. 869 p.

14. Kroll T. Copula Based Risk Aggregation. 2009 (презентация). www.azarmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/copula-based-risk-aggregation.pdf.

15. Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Bank for international settlements (BIS). 2013. 28 p.

16. Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision. Bank for international settlements (BIS).2013. 20 p.

17. Saita F. Value at Risk and Bank Capital Management. Handbook. USA. Elsevier. 2007. 276 p.

18. Wilmott P. Quantitative analysis. Handbook. UK. John Wiley &Sons. 2008. 1064 p.


Review

For citations:


Karminsky A.M., Seryakova E.V. Methods and Models of Market Risk Stress-Testing of the Portfolio of Financial Instruments. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015;(4(43)):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-4-43-53-63

Views: 796


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)