Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-108-119

Abstract

The United States, as one of the five Arctic states, plays what seems at first glance a typical role in the Arctic through their regional policy that uses standard tactical maneuvers, which have proven themselves worthy in other areas of the globe. However, this role is played with unusual passiveness that can be attributed primarily to a lack of an Arctic identity. This is most evident upon comparison with other states of the Arctic "five", which are completely different from each other, and nevertheless are bound by a sense of belonging to the North. The Unites States is the only Arctic state that has not signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, that has taken a firm stance on the sovereignty of the Northwest Passage, that risks increasing tensions with Canada, and that is not developing its icebreaker fleet, which is crucial to operations in the Arctic. This circumpolar strategic ambivalence of a powerful state, that is experienced in conducting foreign affairs, in itself presents significant room for research. Meanwhile, the region's importance is increasing in the changing international environment; it can become a "battlefield" due its strategic geopolitical position and at the same time the "main trophy"due to its abundant hydrocarbon potential. During the recent years, the Arctic has been gradually transforming into a "metaregion" for foreign affairs; its geographically limited borders have spread globally due to an increasing international presence in the Polar Region that has significant energy resources and transportation potential. This is confirmed by the emergence of new actors (including traditionally non-Arctic players), the change in agenda of multilateral discussions (traditional topics, such as protection of the fragile Arctic environment, indigenous peoples of the North, have been complemented with the new "challenges" of energy security, global warming, and militarization), and the strengthening of the institutional framework (the Arctic Council has been more and more influential). In light of the recent tension in Russian-US relations and the rising significance of the Polar Region, US Arctic policy should be the subject of an in-depth analysis of foreign-affairs experts and the government.

About the Author

L. A. Matiyak
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Акимов Ю.Г. «Истинный Север, сильный и свободный»: фактор северности в формировании канадской национальной идентичности. Общество. Среда. Развитие. (Terra Humana). 2012. № 1. С. 197.

2. Rothwell D. The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law. Cambridge University Press, 1996. 224 p.

3. National Security Decision Memorandum - 144 (22.12.1971) [Электронный ресурс]. // Federation of American Scientists. Режим доступа: http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsdm-nixon/nsdm-144.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

4. National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive - 66 (09.01.2009). [Электронный ресурс]. // Federation of American Scientists. Режим доступа: http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

5. Fact Sheet U.S. Arctic Policy (26.12.1994). U.S. Department of State Dispatch, vol. 5, no. 52. [Электронный ресурс]. // U.S. Department of State and the Federal Depository Library at the Richard J. Daley Library, University of Illinois. Режим доступа: http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/dispatch/1994/html/Dispatchv5no52.html (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

6. Huebert R. United States arctic policy: the reluctant arctic power. SPP Briefing papers. University of Calgary. 2009. Vol.2. Iss.2. 27 p.

7. O'Rourke R. Changes in the Arctic. Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service Report (04.08.2014). [Электронный ресурс]. // Federation of American Scientists. Режим доступа: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

8. United States Coast Guard Arctic Strategy (05.2013). [Электронный ресурс]. // US Department of Homeland Security. Режим доступа: http://www.uscg.mil/seniorleadership/DOCS/CG_Arctic_Strategy.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

9. Merklen T. Le regime de l'Arctique: quand la glace n'est plus. Cahiers de recherche en politique appliquee, 2012, no. 1, vol. 4, pp. 29-40. [Электронный ресурс]. // L'Universite de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. Режим доступа: http://www.usherbrooke.ca/politique-appliquee/fileadmin/sites/flsh/politique/documents/cahiers/Vol4-no1-article3.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

10. Декларация Конференции по вопросам Северного Ледовитого океана, Илулиссат, Гренландия (29.05.2008). [Электронный ресурс]. // МИД России. Режим доступа: http://www.mid.ru/bdomp/brp_4.nsf/76bbf733e3936d4543256999005bcbb7/986b38f469167da5c3257458004581fe!OpenDocument (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

11. Конвенция ООН по морскому праву (10.12.1982). [Электронный ресурс]. // ООН. Режим доступа: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pdf/lawsea184-234.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

12. Testimony of Bernard H. Oxman before the Senate Committee on foreign relations on accession to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and ratification of the 1994 agreement regarding part IX of the Convention (14.10.2003). [Электронный ресурс]. // US Senate. Режим доступа: http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2003/OxmanTestimony031014.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

13. Browne M.A. The U.N. Law of the Sea Convention and the United States: developments since October 2003. CRS Report for Congress. [Электронный ресурс]. // Federation of American Scientists. Режим доступа: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21890.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

14. Testimony of William H. Taft, Legal Adviser, Department of State, before the Committee on armed services United States Senate about military implications of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (08.04.2004). [Электронный ресурс]. // US Government Publishing Office. Режим доступа: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-108shrg99782/html/CHRG-108shrg99782.htm (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

15. Bellinger III J. Arctic treasure. // Foreign policy, 2011, 19 May. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/05/19/arctic-treasure/ (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

16. National Strategy for Arctic Region (10.05.2013). [Электронный ресурс]. // The White House. Режим доступа: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf. (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

17. Statement of Scott G. Borgerson, visiting Fellow for Ocean Governance at the Council on Foreign Relations, before the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives about U.S. national security interests in the Arctic (25.04.2009). [Электронный ресурс]. // Council on Foreign Relations. Режим доступа: www.cfr. org/content/publications/attachments/Borgerson_Testimony_3_25_09.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

18. Международно-правовая квалификация морских районов в качестве исторических вод: теория и практика государств. Под ред. А.Н. Вылегжанина. М.: МГИМО - Университет, 2012. 112 с. [Электронный ресурс]. // МГИМО Университет МИД России. Режим доступа: http://www.mgimo.ru/publications/?id=1003308 (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

19. Дегтерев Д.А. Китай-Африка: важные аспекты отношений. // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2005. № 5. C. 84-91.

20. Kingdom of Denmark and United States of America agreement on defence of Greenland (27.04.1951). [Электронный ресурс]. // Lillian Goldman Law Library. Режим доступа: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

21. Закон о самоуправлении Гренландии (21.06.2009). [Электронный ресурс]. // Prime Minister's Office. Режим доступа: http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/GR_Self-Government_UK.doc

22. Keil K. Holy Grail or Next Cold War? Metaphors for Describing the Arctic (11.01.2012). [Электронный ресурс]. //The Arctic Institute. Center for Circumpolar Security Studies. Режим доступа: http://www.thearcticinstitute.org/2012/01/67345-holy-grail-or-next-cold-war.html#more (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

23. Будаев Э. Военная метафорика в дискурсе СМИ. // Acta Linguistica. 2008. Т. 2. № 1. C. 29 - 36. Режим доступа: http://journals.slavica.org/index.php/als/article/view/121/131 (дата обращения 18.02.2015)

24. Canada and United States of America Agreement on arctic cooperation (11.01.1988). [Электронный ресурс]. // ООН. Режим доступа: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201852/volume-1852-i-31529-english.pdf (дата обращения 18.02.2015)


Review

For citations:


Matiyak L.A. Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015;(2(41)):108-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-108-119

Views: 849


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)