Impact of Monetary Policy on the Level of Economic Inequality in the United States
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-97-114
Abstract
Abstract: After the reform of the world monetary system in 1971, the competition between countries for the global market is taking place in completely new conditions. Monetary and fiscal authorities have accumulated vast experience in regulating the economy and strengthening country competitive advantages through complex mechanisms of quantitative easing, foreign exchange rates manipulation, increasing debts, etc. Overcoming the consequences of the financial crises of the 21st century every time forces monetary regulators to implement increasingly radical measures in order to save the economy by injecting enormous amounts of liquidity into the market to buy out bad corporate debts as well as government debt securities. At the same time, the questions of how monetary policy affects the level of economic inequality and who is its beneficiary are becoming more relevant.
The article seeks to analyze the impact of changes in monetary policy parameters on wealth inequality in the United States. Given the cyclical nature of economic inequality, the main method of research was chosen as a graphical statistical analysis, since it allows to identify trends effectively and keep in focus more than 100-year picture of changes in the analyzed indicators. For a more holistic picture, the dynamics of economic wealth inequality level were compared not only with key indicators of monetary policy, but also with the dynamics of marginal tax rates in US.
One conclusion of the research is that wealth inequality depends more on fiscal adjustment and marginal tax rates than on monetary factors. Inadequate marginal income and inheritance tax rates are factors of rising of wealth inequality in US. Changing of monetary system settings also influences on the level of wealth inequality, because it affects the valuation of financial assets, and therefore the wealth of the richest people in US. Another important conclusion is the idea that the new monetary policy, despite all fears that it is a source of growing economic inequality, is acceptable with marginal income and inheritance tax rates of about 60% and with effective macroprudential regulation of US economy.
About the Author
M. L. Dorofeev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail L. Dorofeev - Ph.D. in Economics, associate professor of the Public Finance Department
Moscow
References
1. Balackij E.V. 2017. Effekt Piketti: Kommentarij k Novoj Koncepcii [The Piketty effect: a Commentary on a New Concept]. Prostranstvo Ekonomiki. №2. P. 40-56. DOI: 10.23683/2073- 6606-2017-15-2-40-56 URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/effekt-piketti-kommentariy-knovoy-kontseptsii (accessed 14.10.2020).
2. Berzon N.I. 2008. Zavisimost' riska i dohodnosti aktivov ot vremennogo gorizonta investirovaniya [Dependence of Risk and Return on Assets on the Time Horizon of Investment]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. №3. Р. 65-72.
3. Dzhomo K.S., Popov V.V. 2016. Dolgosrochnye tendencii v raspredelenii dohodov [Long-Term Trends in Income Distribution]. Zhurnal NEA. 3(31). Р. 146–160. URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2016-31-146-160r.pdf (дата обращения 14.10.2020).
4. Dorofeev M.L. 2020a. Aktual'nye vyzovy, stoyashchie pered sistemoj makroprudencial'nogo regulirovaniya ekonomiki v sovremennyh usloviyah [Actual Challenges Facing the System of Macroprudential Regulation of the Economy in Modern Conditions]. Zhurnal Bankovskoe delo. №5. P. 44-51. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42812560 (accessed 14.10.2020).
5. Dorofeev M.L. 2020b. Verifikaciya cenovyh puzyrej na rynke akcij s primeneniem spredov krivoj dohodnosti gosudarstvennogo dolga SSHA [Verification of Price Bubbles in the Stock Market Using Spreads of the US Government Debt Yield Curve]. Zhurnal Bankovskoe delo. №7. P. 58-68. Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.bankdelo.ru/magazine/pub/3453 (accessed 14.10.2020).
6. Dorofeev M.L., Ahmetov A.S. 2020. Aktualizaciya ponyatiya finansovyj puzyr' na finansovyh rynkah [Actualization of the Concept of Financial Bubble in Financial Markets]. Audit i finansovyj analiz. №2. DOI 10.38097/AFA.2020.11.24.011.
7. Kapelyushnikov R.I. 2017. Neravenstvo: kak ne primitivizirovat' problem [Inequality: How not Primitivized Problem]. Voprosy ekonomiki. №4. Р. 117-139. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-117-139
8. Lyubimov I.L. 2016. Vzglyad na evolyuciyu neravenstva dohodov: Piketti protiv Kuzneca – 60 let spustya [A Look at the Evolution of Income Inequality: Piketty vs. Kuznets – 60 Years Later]. Ekonomicheskaya politika. №1. P. 27-42. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vzglyadna-evolyutsiyu-neravenstva-dohodov-piketti-protiv-kuznetsa-60-let-spustya.
9. Malkina M.Yu. 2016. Institucional'nye osnovy neravenstva dohodov v sovremennoj ekonomike [Institutional Foundations of Income Inequality in the Modern Economy]. JIS. №1. P. 100-119. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2016-1-03. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institutsionalnye-osnovy-neravenstva-dohodov-v-sovremennoy-ekonomike (accessed 14.10.2020).
10. Malova T.A. 2020. O chyom signaliziruyut paradoksy global'noj ekonomiki [What the Paradoxes of the Global Economy Signal]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 13(3). P. 225-242. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-3-72-225-242
11. Varshavskij A.E. 2019. Chrezmernoe neravenstvo dohodov – problemy i ugrozy dlya Rossii [Excessive Income Inequality – Problems and Threats for Russia]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 45(8). Р. 52-61. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006136-2
Review
For citations:
Dorofeev M.L. Impact of Monetary Policy on the Level of Economic Inequality in the United States. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020;13(5):97-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-97-114
Views:
1727
Email this article 