Vadim A. Smirnov – PhD in Political Science, Senior Fellow at Laboratory of sociological analysis, modeling and forecasting of risks of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.
The article provides a theoretical analysis of political elites in small states. The author uses comparative analysis and descriptive approach to demonstrate main challenges that small countries ruling class is facing.
The article states that regardless of widespread use of small state concept in political science and international relations theory its definition is still essentially contested. The author elaborates on the quantitative and qualitative approached to the given notion. The conclusion is that small states are not a “small copy” of great powers, and their foreign policy actions are driven by a specific and unique logic. The main feature of this logic is dependency, and asymmetrical relationship with major powers. This shapes the specifics of small state elites’ political preferences and interests.
The article highlights the relevancy of theoretical scrutiny of activity and behavior of political elites of small states. Presented analysis of various cases of political elites’ actions and strategies can to contribute to elite theory. Mainly, contribution is possible in the study of interconnection between internal and external (international) political factors that are influencing actions of elite. This area of research is especially relevant at the current stage of elite theory development. Globally, increase in number of small states, expansion of their toolkit of influence in international system, and erosion of boundary between domestic and foreign policy of states can be considered as a burning issue in Political Science. Also “factor of size” in the field of elite studies in different individual states and interstate associations can further contribute to the discussion.
Key words: small state, political elite, elite theory, international relations, security
1. Baikov A.A., Istomin I.A. O krizisakh, strannykh druzhbakh Rossii i novoi roli malykh i srednikh gosudarstv [On crises, weird friendship of Russia and new role of small and middle states]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy - International Trends, 2013, no. 1, pp. 94-112. (In Russian)
2. Bogaturov A.D. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i vneshniaia politika Rossii [International relations and Russian foreign policy]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2017. 480 p. (In Russian)
3. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Politicheskie elity kak ob”ekt issledovanii v otechestvennoi politicheskoi nauke [Political elites as an object of study in Russian political science]. Politicheskaia nauka - Political Science, 2016, no.2, pp.38-73.
4. Kaveshnikov N. I. Malye i vrednye [Small and ugly]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy - International Trends, 2008, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 84-92. (In Russian)
5. Kashin V. Singapur i Kitai - protivorechivye otnosheniia [Singapore and China has contradictory relations]. Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [Russian International Affairs Council]. 19.09.2016. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=8133#top-content (accessed: 16.10.2016). (In Russian)
6. Khrustalev M.A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaia ekspertiza [The analysis of international situations and political expertise]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2015. 208 p. (In Russian)
7. Amstrup N. The Perennial Problem of Small States: A Survey of Research Efforts. Cooperation and Conflict, 1976, vol.11, no. 2, рр. 163-182.
8. Colomer J. Great Empires, Small Nations. The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State. New York, Routledge Publ., 2007. 128 p.
9. Crowards T. Defining the Category of ‘Small’ States. International Development, 2002, vol. 14, no. 2, рр.143-179.
10. East M. Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models. World Politics, 1973, vol. 25, no. 4, рр. 556–576.
11. Engineering Influence: The Subtile Power of Small States in the CSCE/OSCE. Small States and Alliances. Ed. by E. Reiter and H. Gartner. New York, Springer, 2001. Pр. 63-84.
12. Fox A. The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War Two. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1959. 232 р.
13. Gulbrandsen T. Elite Integration and Institutional Trust in Norway. Comparative Sociology, 2007, no. 6, рр. 190–214.
14. Hey J. Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. London, Lynne Rienner Publ., 2003. 230 р.
15. Katzenstein P. Small States and Small States Revisited. New Political Economy, 2003, vol.18, no. 1, рр. 9-30.
16. Keohane R. Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organization, 1969, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 291–310.
17. Maass M. The Elusive Definition of the Small State. International Politics, 2009, vol.46, no. 1, pp. 65-83.
18. Panke D. Small states in multilateral negotiations. What have we learned? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2012, vol.25, no. 3, рр. 387-398.
19. Rothstein R.L. Alliances and Small Powers. New York, Columbia University Press, 1968. 331 p.
20. Ruostetsaari I. Elite Recruitment and Coherence of the Inner Core of Power in Finland. London, Lexington Books,
2012. 242 p.
21. Small States in the Modern World: Vulnerabilities and Opportunities. Ed. by Baldersheim H., Keating M. Edward Elgar Publ., 2015. 296 p.
22. Small States and International Security: Europe and Beyond. Ed.by Archer C., Bailes A., Wivel A. New York, Routledge Publ., 2014. 264 p.
23. Small States in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Ed. by Steinmetz R., Wivel A. Surrey, Ashgate Publ., 2010. 230 p.
24. The Europe of Elites: A Study Into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political Elites. Ed. by H. Best, G. Lengyel, L. Verzichelli. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012. 314 p.
25. Toje A. The European Union as a Small Power: After the Post-Cold War. New York, Palgrave Macmillan Publ. 2010. 300 p.
26. Vital D. The Inequality of States: a Study of Small Power in International Relations. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1967. 198 p.
27. World Bank Small States Overview. World Bank. Available at: www.worldbank.org/en/country/smallstates/overview (accessed: 06.03.2017).