Paradoxes of Arab Political Systems Changes

Vasily A. Kusnetsov – PhD in Histotical Sciences, Head of the Center for Arab and Islamic Studies of the Institute of Oriental Studies under the Russian Academy of Sciences, 107031, Moscow, 12 Rozhdestvenka St. E-mail: vasiakuznets@yandex.ru.
 
Archive: 
Вся статья: 

DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-5-62-23-48 (Read the article in PDF)

This article explores the antinomies of development of different Arab political systems, drawing on the theory of social order by D. North, J. Wallis and B. Weingast. The author analyses all Arab countries as "orders of limited access", mature or fragile. This approach enables the author to follow the rationale of political development in fragile and failed states, as well as the logic of how political relations form in quasi-states, without raising the question of statehood as such. However, the level of generalization inherent in the theory of social order impedes an analysis of the diverse political reality as we encounter in the Middle East. Therefore, the author (enhances the theoretical framework), identifying three models of political transformation in the Arab world: the Levant-Iraqi, North African and Gulf-Libyan models. Each of these models is organized in its own way, not only in socio-political terms, but also has been developing according to its own logic over the past several decades. In 2010 and 2011, all Arab states were faced with the same, well-known set of challenges and threats. And though responses to these differed case by case and were predetermined by the belonging of a particular system to a particular transformational model, the result was the same: the emergence of drivers of future change, applicable to the entire region. From the author's perspective, these drivers have included: first, a kind of «future phobia», which drives the political behavior of both masses and elites; and second, economic crisis, with which most governments of the region have struggled. At first glance, the political transformations occurring as a result of these drivers appear similar. Democratic procedures, electoral processes and the role of civil society appear to have strengthened and play an increasingly prominent role. The paradox is that, in practice, the above-described regional trends can entail very different social-political consequences, presaging modernization in some places, while driving the archaization of the state in others, depending on which model the respective state belongs to. At the same time, these processes of modernization and archaization stand in a complex relationship with the processes of strengthening / weakening of "orders of limited access": while, tactically, the majority of conscious actions taken by elites is aimed at strengthening "orders of limited access", in the long run, such actions can raise risks and weaken political systems.

Key words: Arab political systems, electoral processes in MENA region, democratization of the Arab world, non-state actors in MENA, modern and archaic in the Middle East

References
1. Akhmedov V.M. Siriya [Syria]. Blizhniy Vostok, Arabskoe probuzhdenie i Rossiya: chto dalshe? [Middle East, Arab Awakening, and Russia: What's Next?]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ., 2012. 595 p. (In Russian)
2. Babenkova S.Yu. Finansovaya sistema Livii kak otrazhenie politicheskoy zhizni strany [Libya's financial system as a reflection of the political life of the country]. Uchenye zapiski Rossiyskoy akademii predprinimatelstva. Nauchnoprakticheskoe izdanie, 2018, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17-26. (In Russian)
3. Baranovskiy V., Naumkin V. Blizhniy Vostok v menyayushchemsya globalnom kontekste: klyuchevye trendy stoletnego razvitiya [The Middle East in a changing global context: key trends in centenary development]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, no. 3, vol. 62, pp. 5-19. DOI: 10.20542/0131- 2227-2018-62-3-5-19 (In Russian)
4. Demchenko A.V. Iordaniya [Jordan]. Blizhniy Vostok, Arabskoe probuzhdenie i Rossiya: chto dalshe? [Middle East, Arab Awakening, and Russia: What's Next?]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ., 2012. 595 p. (In Russian)
5. Dolgov B.V. Islamistskiy vyzov i alzhirskoe obshchestvo (1970-2004 gg.) [The Islamist Challenge and the Algerian Society (1970–2004)]. Moscow, IIIiBV Publ., 2004. 274 p. (In Russian)
6. Dyuverzhe M. Politicheskie partii [Political parties]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, Gaudeamus Publ., 2013. 560 p. (In Russian)
7. Gudkov L. Strah kak ramka ponimaniya proiskhodyashchego // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 1999, №6. P.46-53.
8. Zvyagelskaya I.D. Suverenitet i gosudarstvennost na Blizhnem Vostoke – nevynosimaya khrupkost bytiya [Sovereignty and statehood in the Middle East - intolerable fragility of life]. Kontury globalnykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2017, no. 10 (2), pp. 97-109. (In Russian)
9. Kuznetsov V.A. Problema ukrepleniya gosudarstvennosti na blizhnem vostoke v svete teorii sotsialnykh poryadkov [The problem of strengthening statehood in the Middle East in the light of the theory of social order]. Vostok – Oriens, 2018, no. 3, pp. 6-24. (In Russian)
10. Landa R.G. Istoriya Iordanii XX vek [History of Jordan the twentieth century]. Moscow, Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, 2016. 248 p. (In Russian)
11. Melkumyan Ye.S. Istoriya gosudarstv Arabskogo zaliva (Bakhreyn, Katar, Kuveyt, Obedinennye Arabskie Emiraty, Oman) v XX - nachale XXI v. [History of the Arab Gulf States (Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Oman) in the 20th and early 21st centuries]. Moscow, In-t vostokovedeniya Publ., 2016. 430 p. (In Russian)
12. Mokhova I.M. Marokko [Morocco]. Blizhniy Vostok, Arabskoe probuzhdenie i Rossiya: chto dalshe? [Middle East, Arab Awakening, and Russia: What's Next ?]. Ed. by V.V. Naumkin, V.V. Popov, V.A. Kuznetsov. Moscow, IV RAN Publ., 2012. 595 p. (In Russian)
13. Naumkin V.V. Tsivilizatsii i krizis natsiygosudarstv [Civilizations and the crisis of nation-states]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike, 2014, no. 1, pp. 41-59. (In Russian)
14. Naumkin V.V. Fekhtovanie tsivilizatsiy [Fencing of civilizations]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike, 2007, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 173-184. (In Russian)
15. Nort D., Uollis Dzh., Vayngast B. Nasilie i sotsialnye poryadki. Kontseptualnye ramki dlya interpretatsii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and social order. Conceptual framework for interpreting the written history of mankind]. Moscow, Institut Gaydara Publ., 2011. 480 p. (In Russian)
16. Orlov V.V. Marokko na fone "arabskikh revolyutsiy": faktory ustoychivosti vlasti [Morocco against the background of "Arab revolutions": factors of the stability of power]. Protestnye dvizheniya v arabskikh stranakh: predposylki, osobennosti, perspektivy [Protest movements in Arab countries: background, features, prospects]. Ed. by I. V. Sledzevskiy, A. D. Savateev. Moscow, Knizhnyy dom "Librokom"/ URSS Publ., 2012. 128 p. (In Russian)
17. Robin K. Strakh. Strakh. Istoriya politicheskoy idei [Fear. Fear. The history of political ideas]. Moscow, Progresstraditsiya; Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2007. 368 p. (In Russian)
18. Sapronova M.A. Postrevolyutsionnye konstitutsii i instituty vlasti arabskikh stran (na primere Yegipta, Marokko i Tunisa) [Post-revolutionary constitutions and institutions of power of the Arab countries (on the example of Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia)]. Politicheskaya nauka, 2012, no. 3, pp. 179-198. (In Russian)
19. Arab Human Development in the Twenty- First Century. The Primacy of Empowerment. Ed. by Korany B. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 2014. 416 p.
20. Arab Society. Class, Gender, Power, and Development. Ed. by Hopkins N.S., Ibrahim S.E. 3d ed. Cairo, American University in Cairo Press, 2006. 340 p.
21. Baczko A., Dorronsoro G. Quesnay A.. Civil War in Syria: Mobilization and Competing Social Orders (Problems of International Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 322 p.
22. Bar Sh. Bashar’s Syria: The Regime and its Strategic Worldview. Comparative Strategy, 2006, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 353-445.
23. Barari H.A. The Limits of Political Reform in Jordan. The Role of External Actors. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. December 2013. 11 p.
24. Beinin J., Lockman Z. Workers on the Nile: nationalism, communism, Islam, and the Egyptian working class, 1882 - 1954. Cairo, The American University in Cairo Press Publ., 1998. 488 p.
25. Blaydes L. State Building in the Middle East // Annual Review of Political Science. 2017. Vol. 20. Pp. 487-504.
26. Cammett, M. A Political Economy of the Middle East. New York: Routledge. 2018. 618 p.
27. Choucair J. Illusive Reform. Jordan’s Stubborn Stability. Carnegie Papers. 2006. No. 76. 28 p.
28. Moussaoui A. De la violence en Algérie: les lois du chaos. Arles, Actes Sude Publ., 2006. 447 p.
29. Mundy J. Imaginative Geographies of Algerian Violence. Conflict Science, Conflict Management, Antipolitics. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2015. 280 p.
30. Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Colchester, ECPR Press, 2005. 368 p.
31. Volpi F. Algeria’s Pseudo-Democratic Politics: Lessons for Democratization in the Middle East. Democratization, 2006, vol.13, no. 3, pp. 442-455.
32. Zinecker H. Regime-Hybridity in Developing Countries: Achievements and Limitations on New Research on Transitions. International Studies Review, 2009, no. 11, pp. 302-331.