EU Reactions to China’s Economic Rise
Julia D. Zhdanova – attaché, Department for Nonproliferation and Arms Control, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 32/34 Smolenskaya-Sennaya Sq., 119200, Russia. E-mail: email@example.com.
Igor A. Istomin – PhD in Political Science, Senior Lecturer, Department of Applied International Analysis, MGIMO University. 76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
The international actorness of the European Union is an object of prolonged scholarly and political debates. As an association of states with both complementary and competing interests it faces the problem of collective action. The EU elaborated several mechanisms to mitigate it effect, which, however, do not necessarily avail it to conduct a coherent policy towards other major powers. The current article demonstrates that when it comes to defending European interests in the world arena, Brussels faces a range of challenges even in the most developed spheres of the integration process, such as international economic cooperation. Due to the insufficiency of hegemony, common identity and institutional weakness, the member states of the European Union tend to pursue their own private interests, rather than speak for the common interest. This tendency is traced in the article using the record of relations between the EU and China. Despite the fact that the EU is, in many ways, wealthier and technologically more developed than China, its dependence on huge financial resources flowing from the Asian ascending power has grown in 2010s. While the European Commission’s goal is to secure access to Chinese market for European companies, individual member states vie for Chinese investments. To illustrate this, the article highlights competitive strategies of Germany, Great Britain, France and Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). It examines engagement of the CEECs in the Chinese initiative “16+1”. The authors conclude that competition between European states in financial sphere reduces their bargaining leverage not only in economic matters, but also on some political issues.
Key words: European Union, China, collective action problem, Central and Eastern Europe, European troika, economic cooperation.
1. Valuev A.V. Kitaj i Velikobritaniya: politicheskij dialog v sisteme koordinat global’nogo mira (1991–2015 gg.) [China and Great Britain: Political Dialogue in the Coordination System of the Global World (1991–2015 gg.)]. Rossiya i Kitaj: istoriya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva – Russia and China: History and Prospects of Cooperation. Ed. By D.V. Buyarov, D.V. Kuznetsov, N.V. Kireeva. Blagoveschensk: BPGU, 2015, pp. 465–467 (in Russian).
2. Gnatiuk N. Politicheskaia sub"ektnost' ES? [Political actorness of the EU?]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – International Trends. 2014, vol. 4, no. 39, pp. 32–48 (in Russian).
3. Grablin A.V. Sblighenie Germanii i Kitaya: ot partnerstva do soyuza odin shag? [Germany and China Getting Closer: From Partnership to Alliance One Step?]. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij – Urgent Issues in Contemporary International Relations. 2013. No. 1, pp. 12–16 (in Russian).
4. Krotz U., Maher R. International relations theory and the rise of European foreign and security policy. World Politics. 2011, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 548–579. (Russ. ed.: Krots U., Maer R. Teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i razvitie evropeiskogo sotrudnichestva v sfere vneshnei politiki i politiki bezopasnosti. Sovremennaia nauka o mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh za rubezhom v 3 tomah [Contemporary international relations studies abroad, 1–3 Vol.]. Ed. by I. Ivanov. Moscow, RIAC. 2015, vol. 3, pp. 452–484).
5. Lukonin S. Gretsiya i Kitaj: razvitie ekonomicheskikh otnoshenij na fone krizisa [Greece and China: Development of Economic Relations in the Context of the Crisis]. Sovremennaya Gretsiya v mirovoj ekonomike i politike – Contemporary Greece in World Economy and Politics. Ed. By Yu. Kvashnin. Moscow: IMEMO, 2013. pp. 129–131 (in Russian).
6. Rogachev A. Kitay i ES: Problema predostavleniya statusa ryinochnoy ekonomiki [China and the EU: the issue of granting market economy status]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’ – International Affairs. 2016, no 8, pp. 87–98 (in Russian).
7. Strezhneva M. Sub"ektnost' Evrosoiuza v otrazhenii organizatsionnoi teorii [EU actorness and organizational theory]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – International Trends. 2016, vol. 1, no. 44, pp. 63–76 (in Russian).
8. Troitskii M. Evropeiskii Soiuz v mirovoi politike [The European Union in world politics]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – International Trends. 2004, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 43–58 (in Russian).
9. Bickenbach F., Wan-Hsin L., Guoxue L. The EU–China Bilateral Investment Agreement in Negotiation: Motivation, Conflicts and Perspectives. Kiel Policy Brief, 2015, no. 95. 32 p. Available at: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/wirtschaftspolitik/zentrum-wirtschaftspolitik/kiel-policy-brief/kpb-2015/kiel-policy-brief-95 (accessed: 02.06.2016).
10. Bindi F., Shapiro J. EU Foreign Policy: Myth or Reality? The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe’s Role in the World. Ed. by F. Bindi. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2010, pp. 339–348.
11. Checkel J.T. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 2005, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 801–826.
12. Ekman A., Seaman J. France and China: A not so ‘special’ relationship. Mapping Europe–China Relations: A Bottom–Up Approach. A report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC). Ed. by M. Huotari, M. Otero-Iglesias, J. Seaman, A. Ekman. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), October 2015. Pp. 25-29. Available at: http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Allgemeine_PDF/Mapping_Europe-China_Relations.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2017).
13. EU–China Relations: 2015 and beyond. Business Europe, 03.03.2015. Available at: https://www.businesseurope.eu/publications/eu-china-relations-2015-and-beyond (accessed: 15.08.2017).
14. Godement F., Stanzel A. The European Interest in an Investment Treaty with China. Policy Brief, 2015, no. 127. 10 p. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), 19.02.2015. Available at: http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR127-_The_European_interest_in_an_investment_treaty_with_China_(both_graphics).pdf (accessed: 15.08.2017).
15. Groenleer M., van Schaik L. United We Stand? The European Union’s International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2007, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 969–998.
16. Heilmann S., Rudolf M., Huotari M. China’s Shadow Foreign Policy: parallel structures challenge the existing order. MERICS China Monitor, 2014, no. 18. 9 p. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), October 28, 2014. Available at: http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/China-Monitor/China_Monitor_No_18_en.pdf (accessed: 17.08.2017).
17. Howorth J. Europe at a Historical Crossroads: Grand Strategy or Resignation? Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute for European Integration Research Working Paper, 2011, no. 02. 34 p. Available at: https://eif.univie.ac.at/downloads/workingpapers/wp2011-02.pdf (accessed: 17.08.2017).
18. Howorth J. The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies, 2010, vol. 48, no 3, pp. 455–474.
19. Huotari M. Germany’s China policy: No honeymoon forever. Mapping Europe–China Relations: A Bottom-Up Approach. A report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC). Ed. by M. Huotari, M. Otero-Iglesias, J. Seaman, A. Ekman. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), October 2015. Pp. 30-35. Available at: http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Allgemeine_PDF/Mapping_Europe-China_Relations.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2017).
20. Jupille J., Caporaso J.A. States, Agency and Rules: The European Union in Global Environmental Politics. The European Union in the World Community, 1998, vol. 17, pp. 157–182.
21. Keohane R. After hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 135–181.
22. Keukeleire St., Delreux T. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. 2d ed. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2014. 367 p.
23. Kindleberger Ch. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkley, University of California Press Publ., 1974. 336 p.
24. Le Corre Ph. Could Brexit bring the end of the new Sino–British ‘special relationship’? Brookings, 17.03.2016. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/03/17-chinese-investments-brexit-lecorre (accessed: 17.08.2017).
25. Le Corre Ph., Stumbaum M.-B. Not a European beauty contest: The French and German approach to China. Brookings, 03.11.2016. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2015/11/03-merkel-hollande-visit-china-lecorre-stumbaum (accessed: 17.08.2017).
26. Marsh S., Mackenstein H. The International Relations of the European Union. Harlow, Pearson Longman Publ., 2005. 328 p.
27. Matura T. Hungary and China: Hopes and reality. Mapping Europe–China Relations: A Bottom-Up Approach. A report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC). Ed. by M. Huotari, M. Otero-Iglesias, J. Seaman, A. Ekman. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), October 2015. Pp. 41-45. Available at: http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Allgemeine_PDF/Mapping_Europe-China_Relations.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2017).
28. Meunier S. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press Publ., 2005. 223 p.
29. Niemann A., Bretherton Ch. EU external policy at the crossroads: The challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International Relations, 2013, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 261–275.
30. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Harvard University Press Publ., 2002. 208 p.
31. Plesner-Parello J., Kratz A. How can the EU promote its economic interests with China? Notre Europe, Jacques Delors Institute Policy Paper, 2013, no. 85. 6 p. Available at: http://www.institutdelors.eu/media/euchina-parelloplesnerkratz-ne-jdi-mar13.pdf?pdf=ok (accessed: 17.08.2017).
32. Risse Th. No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2014, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1207–1215.
33. Sjöstedt G. The External Role of the European Community. Farnborough, Saxon House Publ., 1977. 282 p.
34. Song L., Bian Q. The EU through the eyes of Chinese social media: A case study of the official micro-blog of Chinese Foreign Ministry. International Communication Gazette, 2016, vol. 78, no. 1–2, pp. 64–82.
35. Szczudlik-Tatar J. Poland–China relations: Forging a strategic partnership? // Mapping Europe–China Relations: A Bottom-Up Approach. A report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC). Ed. by M. Huotari, M. Otero-Iglesias, J. Seaman, A. Ekman. Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), October 2015. Pp. 56-61. Available at: http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Allgemeine_PDF/Mapping_Europe-China_Relations.pdf (accessed: 14.08.2017).
36. Taking Europe to the World. 50 Years of the European Commission’s External Service. Brussels, European Communities, 2004. Erasmus Thematic Network. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/docs/50_years_brochure_en.pdf (accessed: 17.08.2017).